Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News
On Tuesday, jurors found the primary organizers of the deadly Charlottesville rally liable under state law for injuries to counterprotesters, granting the plaintiffs more than $25 million in damages. Known as the “Unite the Right” rally, the August 2017 event took place in reaction to the removal of a Confederate monument, something known to make racists extremely angry. The rally brought together a who’s who of bigots, including neo-Confederates, neo-fascists, white nationalists, Klansmen, various right-wing groups, and neo-Nazis. On the night of August 11, numerous people marched through the University of Virginia campus waving Confederate flags and chanting white supremacist slogans like “Jews will not replace us!” The action continued the following day when self-identified neo-Nazi James Fields intentionally drove his car into a crowd of counterprotesters, killing one and injuring 35 others, many of them extremely seriously. (Fields, one of the defendants who was found liable on Tuesday, pleaded guilty in 2019 to 29 federal hate crimes and is currently serving several life sentences.) The case was brought by nine plaintiffs who said that in addition to physical injuries—including three concussions and a skull fracture—they suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder, leading to insomnia, panic attacks, and flashbacks.
Per The New York Times:
They said that in addition to holding march organizers responsible for the violence, they hoped to deter hate groups from mounting similar toxic spectacles in the future, relying on civil suits in the absence of decisive action by the criminal justice system.... The jury was asked to decide whether each of the defendants had engaged in a conspiracy, and, if so, what compensation should be paid to the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs drew a line from Mr. Fields through all the organizations that participated, linking him first to Vanguard America, the group that he marched with in Charlottesville, and then to the other organizations and their leaders.... In seeking to prove that the violence was foreseeable, the plaintiffs highlighted how often the idea of hitting protesters with cars came up beforehand. Samantha Froelich, who was dating two of the main organizers simultaneously in the lead-up to the rally, but who has since left the movement, testified that hitting protesters with cars was discussed at a party earlier that summer in the “Fash Loft,” short for fascist, the nickname for [Richard] Spencer’s apartment in Alexandria, Virginia.
After the violence, Matthew Parrott—one of the leaders of the since disbanded Traditionalist Workers Party, which was modeled after the Nazi Party—and the others celebrated. “Charlottesville was a tremendous victory,” he said in a post. “The alt-right is not a pathetic and faceless internet fad, but a fearsome street-fighting force.”
The jury came out deadlocked on the question of whether the defendants had “engaged in a race-based violent conspiracy,” which, to your average old non-racists, seems pretty obvious. While many of the defendants admitted to harboring racial animus, they claimed they were exercising their First Amendment rights, the defense du jour among right-wing bigots, rather than partaking in a conspiracy to commit violence. (According to the Times, “supporters of the defendants maintained a cheering section online full of expletive-laced rants against Black and Jewish people, while the defendants themselves weighed in with commentary.”)
Donald Trump, of course, waited to condemn the violence and then famously declared that despite individuals like the above taking part in the rally, there were “very fine people” on both sides of the divide.
Speaking of Trump’s favorite far-right groups…
The January 6 committee would like a word with the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. Per CNBC:
The House select committee investigating the deadly Capitol invasion said Tuesday it issued subpoenas to the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, two far-right organizations whose members were involved with the Jan. 6 attack. The committee also subpoenaed Proud Boys leader Henry “Enrique” Tarrio and Oath Keepers president Elmer Stewart Rhodes, along with 1st Amendment Praetorian, another organization involved with the lead-up to Jan. 6…. Prosecutors have said in court papers that one Capitol riot defendant “discussed coordination with the Proud Boys and the number of Oath Keepers” who planned to be in Washington on Jan. 6.
One subpoena notes that an indictment in Washington federal court described a “conspiracy among at least 18 Oath Keepers in which members of the Oath Keepers planned to move together in coordination with regular communication to storm the United States Capitol.” That plot allegedly included plans to travel to Washington with “paramilitary gear and additional supplies including firearms, tactical vests with plates, helmets and radio equipment,” the subpoena says.
“We believe the individuals and organizations we subpoenaed today have relevant information about how violence erupted at the Capitol and the preparation leading up to this violent attack,” select committee chairman Bennie Thompson said in a statement.
So that sounds like a no
"Let me be absolutely clear. The president does not support abolishing prisons. He does not support defunding the police. He thinks measures like that would make us less safe." -- Jen Psaki pic.twitter.com/dY7TTnqqof
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) November 23, 2021
Follow us on facebook and twitter!
PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611
No comments:
Post a Comment