Search This Blog

Showing posts with label OLYMPICS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OLYMPICS. Show all posts

Friday, February 4, 2022

RSN: FOCUS: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar | China's Influence in Sports, Entertainment, and Politics Is Subtle but Deadly


 

Reader Supported News
04 February 22

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

 

'The Winter Olympics starts next week in China and that's not good for sports.' (photo: Getty)
FOCUS: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar | China's Influence in Sports, Entertainment, and Politics Is Subtle but Deadly
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's Substack
Abdul-Jabbar writes: "The Winter Olympics starts next week in China and that's not good for sports, the U.S., or democracy in general."

The Winter Olympics starts next week in China and that’s not good for sports, the U.S., or democracy in general. Ideally, the Olympics should be about athletics and nothing more. But it isn’t and never has been. Just as Nazi Germany used the Olympics to legitimize its regime in 1936, so is China hosting these Olympics to promote the county as just another well-meaning superpower, as if our countries are all just a bunch of cute dogs playing poker.

But there’s nothing cute about the way China has been treating us—or our submissive reaction.

I’m uncomfortable criticizing China because it can serve as justification for knuckle-dragging racist blame-bots to harass Asian Americans. Unfortunately, we shouldn’t let childish Flat-Earth mentality stop the adults from having necessary discussions about important world affairs.

We can’t ignore China’s attacks—both overt and subtle—on the United States, nor can we ignore its oppressive policies. China is like Jason Bateman’s character in Ozark: smooth and charming on the outside, but everyone he touches either becomes corrupt or dies.

China’s Concentration Camps Repress Millions

Despite the beauty of China’s culture and history of artistic and intellectual achievements, the current regime is no friend to freedom. Its repression in Hong Kong of the free press, protestors, and elected officials who disagree with mainland policies is the opposite of everything we stand for. Since 2014, it has imprisoned up to two million Muslims, mostly Uyghurs, in forced labor concentration camps (which it refers to as “reeducation camps”), restricting their religious practices and forcing sterilization. Detainees have been subjected to torture and rape and their children have been sent to orphanages.

The U.S. government has not been silent. It has sanctioned Chinese officials and blacklisted agencies and products profiting from the forced labor. In 2021, the U.S. declared China’s behavior to be genocide and crimes against humanity. But the behavior continues unabated and China’s impact on American society rolls merrily along.

China Is Rewriting Hollywood

In 2020, China surpassed North America as the world’s biggest movie market. With nearly twice as many movie screens in China than in the U.S., Hollywood has made concessions in order not to alienate China’s massive movie-going audience. Most famous was the cringeworthy apology from John Cena on May 25, 2021 in which he appears to be groveling in Mandarin as penance for referring to Taiwan as a country. The reason for his self-debasement is that his movie, Fast and Furious 9, was co-produced with the state-owned China Film Group Corporation.

This is not about Cena, who is a great athlete and an entertaining actor (Peacemaker on HBO is terrific). This is about a famous public figure humiliating himself, and to some extent America, for the sake of a movie and his career. I’m not even against his apology as much as the embarrassing overkill in the pursuit of money.

The recent movie 355 is no better. The film is a fun but familiar spy thriller about a group of highly skilled women saving the world. The problem comes when the Chinese agent, vaguely said to work for the government, offers to turn over to the CIA the device that can hack any computer and shut down entire countries. The film also suggests that, while the spy agencies of the governments of the US, England, and Germany (where the women agents work) are corrupt, the Chinese government is selfless. This bit of propaganda, as tasteless as unsalted popcorn, is because the film was co-financed by Beijing-based Huayi Brothers International.

Sports Plays Ball with China

Sports has also felt the heavy influence of China’s economic might. In 2019, Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey tweeted support for the protestors in Hong Kong. The NBA, the most progressive league in sports when it comes to social justice in America, balked, saying Morey’s comments were “regrettable” and that it didn’t “represent the Rockets or the NBA.” However, to the NBA’s credit, when the Chinese government demanded Morey be fired for his tweet, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver flatly refused: “We said there’s no chance that’s happening. There’s no chance we’ll even discipline him.”

China retaliated by not airing NBA games, costing the NBA about $200 million dollars. This had the potential of threatening Nike, which sponsors some NBA players, and earns about $6.6 billion in China. China has only begun to resume airing some games within the past few months.

Last week, officials at the Australian Open called the police on tennis fans who wore t-shirts asking “Where is Peng Shuai?” Shuai is the professional tennis player from China who has gone into seclusion for three months after accusing a high ranking Chinese official of sexual assault. Her accusation was immediately scrubbed from the heavily censored internet by the Chinese government. She later recanted her accusation in a phone interview that convinced no one.

While it’s reprehensible if China has pressured Shuai to withdraw her accusation, equally reprehensible is Tennis Australia’s silencing of those wearing t-shirts in support of her. They use the usual excuse that they prohibit any political statements, as if that’s a good thing. It isn’t. Sure, banning hate speech makes sense, but quashing other forms of free speech doesn’t. Especially when one of the Australian Open’s major commercial partners is Chinese premium liquor brand Guojiao 1573. Is this China’s censorship by proxy?

Tennis Australia’s capitulating behavior looks particularly bad when compared to that of the courageous and defiant Women’s Tennis Association, which has vowed to not hold any tournaments in China in 2022 in response to the treatment of Shuai. Though China produces a significant amount to its annual revenue, the WTA said it was putting “principles ahead of profit.” No apologies in Mandarin here.

What Now?

While we have to be vigilant to the spreading influence of China in our country, we also have to guard against the hypocrisy of many right-wing politicians who rant against China while trying to impose the same repressive behavior here: voting restrictions against minorities, free choice restrictions against women, oppressive laws against the LGBTQ+ community, restrictions against immigrants, and more. Their lack of integrity needs to be quashed as much as China’s meddling.

It has been said that the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do nothing. This is not a call to arms against China. I want our countries to be friends not just business partners. To work together in peace and for peace. I would prefer they were a democracy, but that’s not a condition of our relationship. Democracies and dictatorships have both committed evil that they justified as “for the good of the people.” But smart people see through that lie and demand better. China could thrive without concentration camps, without censoring the internet and press, without putting its heavy thumb on the scales of justice.

In the meantime, we need to be aware of their behind-the-scenes influence and counter it on both political and economic fronts. Who we vote for and what we buy (and don’t buy) can be powerful influences on China too.

A good example of this grassroots power is Tennis Australia quickly reversing its ban on the “Where is Peng Shuai?” t-shirts on January 24 after receiving heavy condemnation. Tennis legend Martina Navratilova called the stance “pathetic” and accused Tennis Australia of “capitulating” to China. Australia’s defense minister Peter Dutton and the foreign minister Marise Payne also defended the right of free speech.

This is good people doing something. They are speaking out.


READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611








POLITICO NIGHTLY: How to spend our Covid vacation

 



 
POLITICO Nightly logo

BY JOANNE KENEN

A person visits a Covid-19 testing site along a Manhattan street in New York City.

A person visits a Covid-19 testing site along a Manhattan street in New York City. | Spencer Platt/Getty Images

A LULL, NOT A BYE-BYE — So now what?

As Nightly told you last week, we’re probably heading into a pandemic lull. Not today, but soonish. Fewer cases, fewer hospitalizations, fewer deaths. All good.

But a lull doesn’t mean an end. And if we want to use the lull wisely to prepare for the next wave — or a future pandemic — we need public health to do a better job communicating to avoid a repeat of the whiplash, anger and distrust that’s worsened division and prolonged the mess we’ve been in.

We, the public, also need to do a better job of listening to nuance but admittedly, based on what we’ve seen over the last two years, that’s a tall order.

Everyone really wants the pandemic to be over (and for those of you who have decided it already is, let me remind you that Covid was the second leading cause of death in the U.S. in January. Deaths are still running around 2,500 a day).

But this virus doesn’t care what we want.

So we have to change how we talk about the future, Ashish Jha, the dean of Brown’s School of Public Health, suggested in an interview with Nightly.

Right now “living with the virus” is often short-hand for ignoring it. What it should mean, instead, is respecting its cadences and knowing when to dial up and dial down our protective responses. When we can do most of what’s really important to us — and when we need to slow it down. Maybe not another “hot vax summer” but a pretty enjoyable spring.

Jha in a recent tweet thread likened virus precautions like masks to rain boots and umbrellas. You don’t need to use all of them when it’s drizzling, but you are way better off having them when it pours. And sometimes it’s going to pour.

But public health hasn’t always done a good job of conveying that uncertainty, so some people feel betrayed or manipulated or lied to when the advice changes. That’s when the demonization of “lying” scientists gets ugly. And counterproductive.

Jha and other experts also worry that there’s a growing belief out there — a hardening but inaccurate conventional wisdom — that viruses always evolve to get less dangerous. “That’s wrong,” he told Nightly. “They can be more deadly,” he told Nightly. Omicron may have been milder than its predecessors, but it’s possible that son (or daughter or third cousin) of Omicron could be a whole lot worse. Or not. We just don’t know.

There’s also too much faith in our acquired immunity, he said. Yes, we have built up a lot through vaccination, natural infection or both.

But that immunity, while probably pretty strong right now, is impermanent. It won’t go away entirely — our immune systems are smarter than that. But based on what researchers are seeing to date, it’s likely to wane.

“People who think natural infection is their ticket to ride for the rest of this pandemic are looking forward to multiple rounds of infection,” Jha said.

More variants — and more surges — are almost certain, Johns Hopkins virologist Andrew Pekosz and his colleague Crystal Watson, an expert on public health risk assessment, told a Bloomberg School of Public Health media briefing this week.

But we also have more tools to cope with that: vaccines, first and foremost, but also new medicines, better understanding how to treat people who get sick, and more abundant testing and supplies.

So public health officials say the lull is a time to keep preparing: stockpiling tests and drugs and vaccines and supplies. And if we end up not needing them, terrific. As Jha pointed out, we spend a huge amount of time and money stockpiling defense equipment and running strategic planning exercises year after year. If there’s no attack, nobody gets mad or makes death threats against the Pentagon’s equivalent of Anthony Fauci.

Having adequate, reliable supplies of those pandemic-fighting tools — which we didn’t have in 2020 — without panicked scrambling will help us manage future outbreaks, said Mandy Cohen, who stepped down a few weeks ago as North Carolina’s top health official.

Public health officials should acknowledge, even lean into, the uncertainty. “Talking in absolutes has gotten folks in trouble,” said Cohen, who did something like 150 public briefings during her tenure, with graphs and data that shed light on both the known and the unknown.

Not to make hope the strategy. But to have a strategy that enables us to hope.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s author on Twitter at @JoanneKenen.

 

HAPPENING THURSDAY – A LONG GAME CONVERSATION ON THE CLIMATE CRISIS : Join POLITICO for back-to-back conversations on climate and sustainability action, starting with a panel led by Global Insider author Ryan Heath focused on insights gleaned from our POLITICO/Morning Consult Global Sustainability Poll of citizens from 13 countries on five continents about how their governments should respond to climate change. Following the panel, join a discussion with POLITICO White House Correspondent Laura Barrón-López and Gina McCarthy, White House national climate advisor, about the Biden administration’s climate and sustainability agenda. REGISTER HERE.

 
 
WHAT'D I MISS?

— Congressional staffers start unionization push with Democrats’ support: Congressional staffers launched an effort today to unionize their workplace as part of a growing reckoning with poor pay and hostile working conditions, encouraged by a groundswell of lawmaker support. The group, dubbed the Congressional Workers Union, said in a statement online it seeks to “unionize the personal offices and committees” throughout Congress. Currently, staffers in personal offices of members and committees can organize but there is not a process in place for them to codify a union or exercise collective bargaining rights.

— North Carolina Supreme Court strikes down GOP-drawn congressional map: North Carolina’s state Supreme Court handed Democrats one of their biggest legal victories yet in the fight over redistricting, striking down a GOP-drawn congressional map that could have given Republicans control of 11 of the state’s 14 districts.

— Biden gets a good news-bad news job report: The government’s latest employment report defied economic forecasts and gave President Joe Biden a sudden burst of good news: a flood of new jobs, surging wages and more workers participating in the labor force, even as Omicron surged. Yet the stock market tumbled after the numbers were released. That’s because the report was so solid — 467,000 jobs were created in January and the totals were revised upward by more than 700,000 for the previous two months — that it provides more fuel for the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates. The Fed’s goal is to bring down inflation, but hiking borrowing costs could also slow economic growth.

— Pence rebukes Trump: ‘I had no right to overturn the election’: In a speech to the conservative Federalist Society, former Vice President Mike Pence rebuked his one time boss, Donald Trump, decrying the notion that he could have overturned the election results on the 45th president’s behalf. “Our Founders were deeply suspicious of consolidated power in the nation’s capital and were rightly concerned with foreign interference if presidential elections were decided in the capital,” Pence said. “But there are those in our party who believe that as the presiding officer over the joint session of Congress, I possessed unilateral authority to reject electoral college votes. And I heard this week, President Trump said I had the right to ‘overturn the election’. President Trump is wrong. … I had no right to overturn the election.”

— GOP censures Cheney, Kinzinger, moves to pull out of debates: Republican Party officials voted to punish GOP Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for their work on the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection and advanced a rule change that would prohibit candidates from participating in debates organized by the Commission on Presidential Debates. GOP officials took a voice vote to approve censuring Cheney and Kinzinger at the Republican National Committee’s winter meeting in Salt Lake City. On Thursday, members of an RNC subcommittee decided to advance the censure resolution against the pair instead of calling for their expulsion from the party.

— Michael Avenatti convicted of stealing from Stormy Daniels: Michael Avenatti was convicted of charges he cheated the porn actor Stormy Daniels out of nearly $300,000 she was supposed to get for writing a book about an alleged tryst with Trump. It was another crushing defeat for the California lawyer, who has faced a host of legal problems after briefly rising to fame as one of Trump’s leading antagonists on cable news early in his administration.

— CDC advisers recommend fully approved Moderna Covid vaccine: CDC’s independent vaccine advisory panel voted unanimously today to recommend Moderna’s two-dose Covid-19 vaccine series for all adults, following the FDA’s formal approval of the product. The recommendation sets up CDC Director Rochelle Walensky to give her endorsement and give the U.S. two fully licensed vaccines in its Covid arsenal.

 

DON’T MISS CONGRESS MINUTES: Need to follow the action on Capitol Hill blow-by-blow? Check out Minutes, POLITICO’s new platform that delivers the latest exclusives, twists and much more in real time. Get it on your desktop or download the POLITICO mobile app for iOS or AndroidCHECK OUT CONGRESS MINUTES HERE.

 
 
AROUND THE WORLD

Fireworks in the shape of the Olympic rings go off over the National Stadium, known as the Bird's Nest, in Beijing, during the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympic Games.

Fireworks in the shape of the Olympic rings go off over the National Stadium, known as the Bird's Nest, in Beijing, during the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympic Games. | Li Xin - Pool/Getty Images

LET A WILD GAMES BEGIN — International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach urged world leaders to “give peace a chance” at the outset of the Winter Games in Beijing — an apparent nod to the ongoing security crisis along Ukraine’s borders and Western criticism of China’s human rights abuses.

“In our fragile world — where division, conflict and mistrust are on the rise — we show the world, yes, it is possible to be fierce rivals while at the same time living peacefully and respectfully together,” Bach said in an address at the games’ opening ceremony, which was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

“In this Olympic spirit of peace,” Bach added, “I appeal to all political authorities across the world: Observe your commitment to this Olympic truth. Give peace a chance.”

Bach’s remarks come as tensions continue to escalate in Eastern Europe, where Russia has massed roughly 100,000 troops around Ukraine in a military build-up that has sparked concern in the United States and other NATO nations.

NIGHTLY NUMBER

49

The number of states in which new daily cases of Covid are declining.

PARTING WORDS

The Salt Lake City skyline.

The Salt Lake City skyline. | Getty Images

PITCH IMPERFECT — Salt Lake City’s pitch this week for the 2024 Republican National Convention seemed to be going well. There were helicopter rides, Wagyu steaks and tours of facilities built for the 2002 Winter Olympics.

Then the local TV weatherman took the floor Tuesday at the host committee’s luncheon. After talking about the region’s ideal summer weather and low humidity compared to the three other finalist cities — Milwaukee, Nashville and Pittsburgh — he began showing footage of ping-pong ball-sized hail and flood waters gushing through the city as trash bins floated along.

He brought up the tornado of August 1999 — assuring the RNC site selection committee members that only one person died in the event.

Some in the audience watched “aghast,” said one member of the committee, which is tasked with selecting the city that will host the party’s next presidential nominating convention. The member, who asked not to be identified, chuckled recounting the presentation — as did three other people present at the luncheon.

The Salt Lake City weather pitch wasn’t the only wrinkle in the RNC’s convention city selection process in recent days. Pittsburgh’s prospects suddenly nosedived. Nashville’s odds skyrocketed. A location announcement for the GOP’s summer 2024 convention isn’t expected to come until the RNC summer meeting in August, when the full body will likely vote to affirm the site selection committee’s decision.


 

Follow us on Twitter

Chris Suellentrop @suellentrop

Tyler Weyant @tweyant

Renuka Rayasam @renurayasam

Myah Ward @myahward

 

FOLLOW US


POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA







Fast Forward The news you need for the day ahead by Teresa Hanafin

 



RSN: FOCUS: Xi and Putin Urge Nato to Rule Out Expansion as Ukraine Tensions Rise

 

 

Reader Supported News
04 February 22

A Thank You and a Concern

We covered our budget for January, but it took every last hour of every last day to get it done. Many of you helped. To those who did help, everyone who produces RSN and everyone who comes to RSN owes you a debt of gratitude.

The concern for February is that there are 3 fewer days, 72 fewer hours and no fewer invoices. That’s February, we have to accomplish in 28 days what it took 31 days to accomplish in January.

#AQuickStartWillMatter. Getting out of the gate quickly in February will be essential to avoiding fundraising failure.

Fundraising is hard work, lend a hand.

In solidarity.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation


 

Reader Supported News
04 February 22

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

 

Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping pose for a photograph before their talks in Beijing, China. (photo: Ramil Sitdikov/AP)
FOCUS: Xi and Putin Urge Nato to Rule Out Expansion as Ukraine Tensions Rise
Andrew Roth and Vincent Ni, Guardian UK
Excerpt: "China's Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin of Russia have signed a joint statement calling on the west to 'abandon the ideologised approaches of the cold war,' as the two leaders showcased their warming relationship in Beijing at the start of the Winter Olympics."

Chinese and Russian leaders call on west to abandon ‘cold war’ approach at pre-Olympic meeting

China’s Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin of Russia have signed a joint statement calling on the west to “abandon the ideologised approaches of the cold war”, as the two leaders showcased their warming relationship in Beijing at the start of the Winter Olympics.

The politicans also said the bonds between the two countries had “no limits”. “[T]here are no ‘forbidden’ areas of cooperation’,” they declared.

In the joint statement released by the Kremlin, Putin and Xi called on Nato to rule out expansion in eastern Europe, denounced the formation of security blocs in the Asia Pacific region, and criticised the Aukus trilateral security pact between the US, UK and Australia.

The two leaders met for the 38th time since 2013. The two countries also pledged to step up cooperation to thwart “colour revolutions” and external interference, and vowed to further deepen “back-to-back” strategic coordination.

The statement declared that the new Sino-Russia relations were “superior to political and military alliances of the cold war era”. It shows the ambitions and anxieties China and Russia both share, and how they have increasingly found common interest in their respective disagreements with western powers, analysts say.

“The parties oppose the further expansion of Nato, call on the North Atlantic alliance to abandon the ideologised approaches of the cold war, respect the sovereignty, security and interests of other countries, the diversity of their civilisational and cultural-historical patterns, and treat the peaceful development of other states objectively and fairly,” the document said.

In a nod to Russian interests in Ukraine, China said it “understands and supports the proposals put forward by the Russian Federation on the formation of long-term legally binding security guarantees in Europe”, the document said.

At the same time, it addressed Chinese concerns about US-led trade and security alliances in its own region – something Beijing has intensified its criticism of in recent years.

“The parties oppose the formation of closed bloc structures and opposing camps in the Asia Pacific region, and remain highly vigilant about the negative impact of the US Indo-Pacific strategy on peace and stability in this region,” it read.

While there are still stumbling blocks in the relationship and a fully-fledged alliance between Moscow and Beijing is unlikely, the two sides are signalling that they want to roll back US influence in their respective regions.

“We are working together to bring to life true multilateralism,” Xi told Putin, according to the Kremlin translation of their remarks. “Defending the real spirit of democracy serves as a reliable foundation for uniting the world in overcoming crises and defending equality.”

The statement also devoted an entire section on the two sides’ shared understanding of “democracy” and claimed both countries “have long-standing traditions of democracy”. But they said that the advocacy of democracy and human rights “must not be used to put pressure on other countries”.

Friday’s meeting was Xi’s first face-to-face engagement with a foreign leader in nearly two years. The Chinese leader has not left the country since January 2020, when it was grappling with its initial Covid-19 outbreak and locked down the central city of Wuhan where the virus was first reported.

He is preparing to meet more than 20 leaders as Beijing kicks off a Winter Olympics it hopes will be a soft-power triumph and shift focus away from a buildup blighted by a diplomatic boycott and Covid fears.

It was also a rare trip abroad for Putin, who has left Russia just twice since the outbreak of Covid-19 and has maintained a healthy distance from visiting leaders such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán.

But as he strode toward Xi on Friday, Putin gave a wide smile and shook the Chinese leader’s hand before posing for photographers. The two are expected to attend the Olympic opening ceremony on Friday evening.

Following their talks, Russia and China also signed a series of trade and energy deals, including a new contract for Russia to supply an additional 10bn cubic metres of gas each year to China, Putin announced. Gazprom announced the 30-year contract to deliver the gas from Russia’s far east to the Chinese state energy corporation CNPC, Reuters reported.

Russia already supplies China with about 38bn cubic metres of gas each year via its Power of Siberia pipeline, and is eyeing a second pipeline that would open an additional market for Yamal peninsula gasfields as its Nord Stream 2 pipeline to Germany has been threatened with sanctions in case of a Russian attack on Ukraine.

The leaders of both France and Germany have said they plan to travel to Moscow in the coming weeks to continue talks with Putin and head off a potential invasion of Ukraine. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, is expected to visit Moscow on Monday and then travel on to Kyiv on Tuesday, as he practices shuttle diplomacy between Putin and the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Germany’s Olaf Scholz will travel to Kyiv on the 14 February and Moscow the next day.

China’s state-run Xinhua news agency also carried an article from Putin on Thursday in which the Russian leader painted a portrait of two neighbours with increasingly shared global goals.

“Foreign policy coordination between Russia and China is based on close and coinciding approaches to solving global and regional issues,” Putin wrote.

He also hit out at US-led diplomatic boycotts of the Beijing Olympics that were sparked by China’s human rights record.

“Sadly, attempts by a number of countries to politicise sports for their selfish interests have recently intensified,” Putin wrote, calling such moves “fundamentally wrong”.

For its part, China has become more vocal in backing Russia in its dispute with Nato powers over Ukraine.

Last week, China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, called Russia’s security concerns “legitimate”, saying they should be “taken seriously and addressed”.

Moscow is looking for support after its deployment of 100,000 troops near its border with Ukraine prompted western nations to warn of an invasion and threaten “severe consequences” in response to any Russian attack.

China enjoyed plentiful support from the Soviet Union – the precursor to the modern Russian state – after the establishment of Communist rule in 1949, but the two socialist powers later fell out over ideological differences.

Relations got back on track as the cold war ended in the 1990s, and the pair have pursued a strategic partnership in recent years that has seen them work closely on trade, military and geopolitical issues.

Those bonds have strengthened further during the Xi Jinping era, at a time when Russia and China find themselves increasingly at odds with western powers. In 2014, in a show of defiance against fierce western criticism over the annexation of Crimea, Putin turned to Xi to look for an alternative. Beijing showed its support by signing a $400bn, 30-year gas deal.

Other leaders set to enjoy Xi’s hospitality during the Games include Egypt’s Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed bin Salman, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev of Kazakhstan and Poland’s Andrzej Duda.

About 21 world leaders are expected to attend the Games. A majority of those leaders rule non-democratic regimes, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index, with 12 labelled either “authoritarian” or a “hybrid regime”.


READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611






"Look Me In The Eye" | Lucas Kunce for Missouri

  Help Lucas Kunce defeat Josh Hawley in November: https://LucasKunce.com/chip-in/ Josh Hawley has been a proud leader in the fight to ...