Search This Blog

Showing posts with label MARK MILLEY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MARK MILLEY. Show all posts

Sunday, November 28, 2021

Racist murderer's lawyer equates Al Sharpton to KKK

 

Today's Top Stories:

photo
Attorney for Ahmaud Arbery’s murderer regrets not equating Sharpton and other Black pastors to KKK during trial

Clarifying his objection to Black pastors attending the trial, defense attorney Kevin Gough suggested there was a double standard at play since Klan members wouldn't be allowed in.


Super-mutated Omicron variant reaches three more European countries
Although the United States has not yet confirmed any cases of the Omicron variant, Dr. Anthony Fauci said on Saturday that he wouldn’t be surprised if the variant was already circulating in the country.



photo
Kevin McCarthy HUMILIATES himself with ultimate fail

No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen: What an embarrassment.


Trump says top US general should be "tried for treason" for intervening to prevent a war with China
The disgraced ex-president and man of many grievances said that Gen. Mark Milley should be "tried for treason" — a crime punishable by death — for taking steps to prevent a war with China during his term.


More trouble with QAnon: Now ex-Trump lawyer Lin Wood says "Stop The Steal" is a "deep state" plot
Yes, Democats embedded in Trump's government secretly tricked Trumpers to try to violently stop Biden from taking office. Riiiiiight.



QAnon Hero Michael Flynn secretly said QAnon is "total nonsense"
Oops.


MAGA rioter who compared insurrectionists to Disney World crowds denied pre-trial release for 6th time
Prosecutors requested that Judge Amit Mehta deny Kenneth Harrelson's latest try at release, saying his request was "rife with outlandish arguments." In a previous plea for release that Mehta denied, Harrelson cited COVID-19 conspiracy theories as a reason that he should be released from custody before his trial.


photo
Marjorie Taylor Greene, Madison Cawthorn, and Lauren Boebert's extremism costing them support from their voters

United Rural Democrats: New extremists in Congress are taking their districts for granted while delivering nothing for them. United Rural Democrats are organizing on the ground to shock Republicans by winning back Middle America. But they need your help!


Ted Cruz and Donald Trump Jr. taunt the WHO for skipping "Xi" to name the new coronavirus variant "Omicron"
Following an announcement on Friday that the new variant would be called Omicron, speculation arose that two letters were skipped to avoid confusion with the English word "new" and avoid antagonizing Chinese President Xi Jinping.



Jared Kushner raising Saudi cash after cozying up to crown prince while working for Trump
Trump's son-in-law, who has presided over several high-profile investment failures in the business world, is banking on a sizable contribution from the kingdom's $450 billion Public Investment Fund for his new investment firm.



Seriously?

Yes. Seriously.

Hope...


Sunday Funnies

Sunday Funny
Sunday Funny
Sunday Funny
Sunday Funny





Friday, September 24, 2021

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Treason!


JOHN KIRIAKOU: Treason!

September 16, 2021


The perplexing overuse of the word is a testament to the vitriol with which Americans now conduct political discussions.

President Donald Trump and Army Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan, Nov. 28, 2019. (DOD/ U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Dominique A. Pineiro/Flickr)

By John Kiriakou
Special to Consortium News

General Mark Milley, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been in the news this week. The Washington Post reported that in the final months of the Trump Administration, Milley on two occasions phoned his Chinese counterpart to assure him that the U.S. military leadership would not allow President Donald Trump to launch a war with China.

The U.S. Intelligence Community had concluded that the Chinese feared that Trump would ignite a war in the South China Sea, and the Chinese began making defensive moves. Milley called Chinese General Li Zuecheng to assure him that “democracy was sloppy sometimes,” but that there would be no war with China. Milley also expressed his grave concerns about Trump’s mental state with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Within hours of the Post’s report, Trump accused Milley of “treason.” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said that Milley’s behavior was “treasonous.” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) called Milley “treasonist” (sic). And a lineup of Fox News hosts echoed the sentiment. The casualness with which people are throwing around an accusation that, if prosecuted, can carry the death penalty, reminds me of Donald Trump three years ago.

Trump in 2018 accused an FBI agent who, during the 2016 campaign, had sent anti-Trump texts to his girlfriend, also an FBI agent, of “treason.” He told he The Wall Street Journal, “A man is tweeting [sic] to his lover that if Hillary loses, we’ll essentially do the insurance policy. This is the FBI we’re talking about – that is treason.”

Treason is arguably the gravest crime with which an American can be charged. And it’s being bandied about as punishment for a general making a phone call to his Chinese counterpart and for an FBI agent sending a text that the president didn’t like. 

What the Constitution Says

Treason is one of only two crimes that are actually defined in the Constitution. Article III, Section 3 states clearly:

“Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.”

Treason can only technically be committed during wartime as only a Congressional declaration of war creates an “enemy.”

Milley obviously didn’t commit treason. But this isn’t just Republicans being their normal bombastic selves. “Treason” is a term that is used far too loosely these days. And it’s dangerous.

A couple of years ago I appeared in an obscure Spike TV documentary about whistleblowers. The reporters interviewed friends, supporters, and journalists. They each offered their views on the motivation of whistleblowers, what I had revealed about the CIA’s torture program, and the Obama administration’s use of the Espionage Act to curb national security whistleblowing.

The responses were what you might expect – whistleblowing is good, the public has a need to know, etc. But one of the people interviewed, Ronald Kessler, a has-been reporter for the hard right-wing newspaper The Washington Times, said pointedly that the discussion shouldn’t be about the concept of whistleblowing. It should be about my “treason” against the United States. The interviewer pressed him and he repeated, “Kiriakou is a traitor.”

I allowed myself a few days to cool off and, in the end, I just let it go. Nobody saw that documentary anyway, and Kessler was so unhinged that the handful of people who did see it didn’t take him seriously.

Few Cases in History 

George Washington is believed to have slept at the Brandywine Mansion in Coatesville, Chester County, Pennsylvania on his return from putting down the Whiskey Rebellion. (Smallbones/Wikimedia Commons)

But that word “treason” has entered the American political vernacular. We see it all the time now, as if it’s somehow normal that traitors are allowed to commit their treason and continue to walk the streets and work in high-ranking positions in the government. In just the past two years there have been myriad examples.

Former Maricopa County, Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio, himself a convicted criminal, said after a speech on the floor of the Senate by then-Arizona Republican senator Jeff Flake that Flake’s criticism of Trump was “a treason-type situation.”

Former White House counselor Steve Bannon told author Michael Wolff for his book Fire and Fury that Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting with a Russian attorney during the campaign was “treasonous.” Should Trump Jr. get the death penalty for taking the meeting? You don’t have to like the Trumps to think not.

When whistleblower Chelsea Manning announced her short-lived candidacy for a U.S. Senate seat in Maryland in 2018, the conservative Washington Examiner called her an “entitled traitor” and breathlessly said, “Chelsea Manning, former soldier, nearly convicted of treason, announced over the weekend he [sic] is running for U.S. Senate from the state of Maryland.” Wow. Never mind that Manning was never charged with treason.

So who has committed treason in U.S. history? Not many people. There have been only 15 across the centuries. The first were Philip Vigol and John Mitchell, both sentenced to hang for their roles in the Whiskey Rebellion. They were pardoned by George Washington. Another was the great abolitionist John Brown, who was executed in 1859 for his attempt to organize armed resistance to slavery.

The most recent were five individuals who took up arms against the U.S. or who worked as propagandists against the U.S. during World War II. They included Axis Sally and Tokyo Rose.

This perplexing use of the word “treason” is a testament to the vitriol with which Americans now conduct political discussions. But talk of treason has to stop right now. The only logical next step is that somebody in a position of authority, a particularly authoritarian president (like Trump) or an attorney general, for example, takes it to a prosecution. And at that point the Constitution is dead.

John Kiriakou is a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior investigator with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. John became the sixth whistleblower indicted by the Obama administration under the Espionage Act—a law designed to punish spies. He served 23 months in prison as a result of his attempts to oppose the Bush administration’s torture program.

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.


LINK

Saturday, September 18, 2021

GOP gov issues disgusting AIDS lie to back vax lies


FDA panel votes for Pfizer's booster shot for ages 65+

Today's Top Stories:

photo
GOP gov repeatedly cites imaginary AIDS vaccine in campaign against health mandates

Pushing back against health measures meant to curb the raging pandemic, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp keeps mentioning failed past mandates for an AIDS vaccine that simply doesn't exist.

Take Action: Demand Fox be held liable for vaccine disinformation that’s getting people killed!


Civilian Pentagon official in the Trump administration spoke with China on January 6, two days before Gen. Milley's controversial call
A deputy to then-President Trump's acting secretary of defense held a call with his Chinese counterpart two days before the now-controversial call by Gen. Mark Milley, undercutting criticism that the Joint Chiefs chairman was out of line.

Take Action: Demand the Jan 6th select committee subpoena Trump and insurrectionist-supporting Republicans NOW


photo
FINALLY - promising news on voting rights legislation!

No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen: About time.


Sarah Palin says she’s not vaccinated because she believes "in the science"
"I am one of those white, common sense conservatives," Palin said. "I believe in science and I have not taken the shot."


Post-presidency protection for Trump kids and officials has cost $1.7 million so far
In the waning days of the his disastrous presidency, Trump signed a highly unusual order that gifted six extra months of Secret Service protection to his four adult children, their families, and three of his favorite officials.


photo
Laura Loomer, who once said ‘bad fajitas’ were worse than COVID, currently battling brutal case

The far-right, anti-Muslim, anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer says she’s tested positive for the coronavirus, after suffering from severe symptoms that she wrote left her feeling like she "got hit by a bus."


Pennsylvania GOP lawmakers file lawsuit to toss out mail-in voting they previously approved
It's just like our parents and teachers used to tell us when we were kids — "If you can't win, change the rules!"


photo
Retired Major Richard Ojeda breaks down the treasonous final days of the Trump presidency

No Dem Left Behind: The Democratic star exposes the military coup that almost was.


Newly unredacted documents reveal litany of allegations against Mike Pompeo
Spoiler alert: Mike broke a lot of rules.


Jared Kushner's family firm set to unleash eviction wave amid pandemic
Properties owned by Kushner's family company have filed at least 590 eviction lawsuits since last March, because nothing feels better than being super rich.

Take Action: Tell President Biden to tax the wealthy to fund the infrastructure plan!


Thousands of Haitian migrants decamped under Texas bridge in squalid conditions
Food and water are scarce at the camp. With sweltering heat and triple-digit temperatures, migrants are bathing in the Rio Grande and wading back and forth across the river to buy food and water in Mexico.


Afghanistan drone strike the Pentagon previously described as "righteous" killed as many as 10 civilians, officials say
General Frank McKenzie, the commander of the US Central Command, called the errant strike "a tragic mistake" during a news conference Friday afternoon.


photo


Seriously?

Yes. Seriously.

Hope...


PS — Please don't forget to sign the petition calling on Joe Manchin to support Biden's reconciliation package, and be sure to follow OD Action on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. 






RSN: FOCUS: Trump Put Milley in an Impossible Position

 


Reader Supported News
17 September 21

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

A $100 DONATION WOULD FIX OUR FRIDAY PROBLEM. We won’t likely get many donations today, but if a few of them were in the $100 range we would have a fighting chance. Not everyone can afford to donate $100, but a few can. Anyone?
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs General Mark Milley. (photo: Susan Walsh/AP)
FOCUS: Trump Put Milley in an Impossible Position
Tom Nichols, The Atlantic
Nichols writes: "The general stayed inside the lines - barely. The real problem is that he was in that situation at all."

The general stayed inside the lines—barely. The real problem is that he was in that situation at all.

Did the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, violate the Constitution? The answer, at least on the current available evidence, is no.

In a new book, Bob Woodward and Robert Costa write that Milley contacted his opposite number in China just before and just after the 2020 election. Milley, according to Woodward and Costa, was reaching out to General Li Zuocheng to calm jangled nerves in Beijing about the stability of the United States. Milley also reportedly called together a group of senior U.S. officers and made them affirm, one by one, that they understood that the procedure for the release of nuclear weapons had to include him.

fusillade of hot takes greeted these revelations, almost all of them focusing on Milley’s contacts with Li. Many Republicans immediately interpreted Milley’s reassurances as betrayal and demanded that he resign or be fired. But it’s not just Republicans who are concerned: Retired Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, whom no one would mistake for a Trump supporter, tweeted that Milley violated the core American precept of civilian control of the military and therefore must go.

Milley’s conversations with Li are a concern not because they were unprecedented or a betrayal (as his critics claim) but because Milley felt the need to have them at all. Senior military-to-military contacts are normal and are an important part of building trust between nations, especially between adversaries. In the late 1990s, I had students from Russia in my Naval War College seminars. We valued their presence enough that when the Kremlin pulled them out after the war in Kosovo, I was sent to Moscow in hopes of creating more joint programs with the Russians that might include bringing those officers back. (I do not, of course, in any way represent the views of the Defense Department or the U.S. government.)

The fact that Milley knew his Chinese counterpart personally is not only a good thing in itself; such relationships exist for moments exactly like the ones described in the Woodward and Costa book. If Milley had information, as Woodward and Costa say he did, that Chinese military leaders were “rattled” by the chaos in Washington, then by reaching out to his peer he did exactly what he should have done.

One of the accusations against Milley is that somehow the chairman was going to betray American war plans to the Chinese. This is ludicrous, and even Senator Tom Cotton, a Republican China hawk, said that this accusation against Milley seemed far-fetched. Milley, invoking his personal relationship with his Chinese counterpart, told Li that he would hear about any military action from Milley himself. This is what reassurance and transparency looks like in a crisis.

The far more serious question is whether Milley inserted himself into the nuclear chain of command. Woodward and Costa write that Milley knew he was “pulling a Schlesinger,” trying to interpose himself in a nuclear process that does not, in fact, have a role for the chairman, in the same way that Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger had done in 1974 when he instructed the military to check any nuclear orders with him or Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.

Even here, however, the situation is not as clear-cut as the Schlesinger example. Concerned that Richard Nixon was drinking heavily and under immense stress, Schlesinger functionally replaced the president as the ultimate authority for the release of nuclear weapons. Milley was somewhat more guarded; according to Woodward and Costa, the chairman “called a secret meeting in his Pentagon office on January 8 to review the process for military action, and said: ‘No matter what you are told, you do the procedure. You do the process. And I’m part of that procedure.’”

The chairman, however, is not part of that procedure. He is the president’s adviser, with no operational authority. When the president orders military action, the secretary of defense relays those orders to military commands. In the case of nuclear-weapon deployment, the president must only verify his identity, a process that requires one other person to certify that the orders and the codes are in fact coming from the commander in chief.

This is remarkably dangerous. Worse, it was designed that way. During the Cold War, the United States wanted the Soviets to understand that the president, even with only minutes of warning, could order nuclear strikes without a long and complicated procedure—especially if “the president” was whoever was left in the line of succession.

So what was Milley doing? When he said “no matter what you are told,” it is hard to believe that he did not mean “including by the president,” and that alone is a breach of civil-military tradition and an overstepping of his military authority. Unlike Schlesinger, Milley did not displace the commander in chief, but he did redefine the chain of command to include a previously nonexistent requirement that he be informed no matter what the civilian leadership told any U.S. military officer.

This doesn’t mean Milley should be relieved or fired. He made a judgment call in an unprecedented situation, and we should be glad for it. The Constitution of the United States has no provision for the control of planet-destroying weapons while a president is losing his mind and trying to overthrow the government itself. Even the Twenty-Fifth Amendment was meant to spackle the gaps in presidential succession in the case of death or disability. It does not countenance speedily removing the president from office against his will—especially while the vice president and the entire Congress are under armed guard from a violent mob carrying nooses and smearing feces on the walls of the Capitol.

Milley was looking at a civilian leadership in complete disarray, with the executive branch in the hands of a coterie of cronies—including an acting secretary of defense who by his own admission had no idea what was going on most of the time—and a president whose understanding of “the nuclear,” as he called our strategic deterrent, was childlike at best.

At the least, Milley was trying to insert a moment of pause into any possible escalation to disaster, and for that we should be grateful. His order was insurance against the chance that a raving Donald Trump, some hapless lieutenant commander, and the Acting-Temporary-Undersecretary for Advanced Defense Widgets could get together in the basement of the White House to transmit the codes to hell to the U.S. Strategic Command without anyone else knowing about it.

Milley didn’t “pull a Schlesinger,” but he was close.

What should we do about all this? As the defense expert Kori Schake and others have noted, the real problem here is that Milley was in this situation at all. As is almost always the case when civil-military relations become unstable, the civilians are the problem, and the civilians must provide the remedies. There are several possibilities, including passing a law to restrict the first use of nuclear arms, or in peacetime adding the requirement of a second confirmation to the president’s orders.

In the end, however, the answer lies in electing better leaders. Trump is gone, but he still leads a seditious and unhinged party. The Constitution, as James Madison warned us, was meant for a virtuous people, and if there is no virtue among us, “we are in a wretched situation” and “no theoretical checks, no form of government can render us secure.” It is incumbent upon us, the voters, to ensure that no military officer ever again faces even the possibility of a choice between obedience to the Constitution and the fate of human civilization itself.


READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611







Thursday, September 16, 2021

RSN: FOCUS: Bess Levin | Trump Told Pence They Wouldn't Be Friends Anymore if the VP Didn't Overturn the Election, Because He's a 5-Year-Old

 


 

Reader Supported News
16 September 21

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

NO THOUSAND DOLLAR DONATIONS FOR SEPTEMBER. At some point over the course of each month, for years, a sustaining donor has come through with a four-digit contribution. So far that’s lacking this month and that is an important reason why our September drive is struggling to meet the organization’s expenses. Respectfully submitted.
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

Vice President Mike Pence speaks at a briefing about the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic as President Donald Trump looks on in the White House Rose Garden, April 27, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (photo: Jabin Botsford/Getty)
FOCUS: Bess Levin | Trump Told Pence They Wouldn't Be Friends Anymore if the VP Didn't Overturn the Election, Because He's a 5-Year-Old
Bess Levin, Vanity Fair
Levin writes: "In the days following the January 6 attack on the Capitol, a narrative emerged in which Donald Trump's longtime footstool, Mike Pence, was hailed as something of a hero for refusing to overturn the results of the 2020 election."


He also called Pence a “wimp,” because that’s the level of maturity we’re dealing with here.


In the days following the January 6 attack on the Capitol, a narrative emerged in which Donald Trump’s longtime footstool, Mike Pence, was hailed as something of a hero for refusing to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Despite relentless pressure from the then president to block Joe Biden’s electoral win, which entailed “alternately cajoling and browbeating” the V.P. and telling him, “You can either go down in history as a patriot, or you can go down in history as a pussy,” Pence officially certified the results following a short interlude in which Trump’s supporters threatened to kill him.

But as it turns out, Pence came much closer to overthrowing democracy on his boss’s behalf. According to Peril, a new book out next week by veteran reporters Bob Woodward and Robert Costa, Pence, in his own telling, did “everything” he could to try and stop the certification of a free and fair election. Per CNN:

Even though Pence stood up to Trump in the end, Peril reveals that after four years of abject loyalty, he struggled with the decision. Woodward and Costa write that Pence reached out to Dan Quayle, who had been the vice president to George H.W. Bush, seeking his advice.

Over and over, Pence asked if there was anything he could do. “Mike, you have no flexibility on this. None. Zero. Forget it. Put it away,” Quayle told him. Pence pressed again. “You don’t know the position I’m in,” he said, according to the authors. “I do know the position you’re in,” Quayle responded. “I also know what the law is. You listen to the parliamentarian. That’s all you do. You have no power.”

When it apparently became clear to Pence that he couldn’t, in fact, overturn the election results, he still reportedly went to great lengths to explain to Trump that he very much wanted to be a good little solider, saying, “I’ve done everything I could and then some to find a way around this.” That obsequiousness, sans action, was obviously not good enough for Trump, who had also tried to convince Pence by appealing to what he believed was everyone’s secret desire to be an authoritarian dictator. “If these people say you had the power, wouldn’t you want to?” Trump asked, apparently referring to the MAGA crowd assembled on Pennsylvania Avenue. “I wouldn’t want any one person to have that authority,” Pence responded. “But wouldn’t it be almost cool to have that power?” Trump asked, again betraying his admiration for autocrats.

It was after Pence remained firm, according to Woodward and Costa, that Trump resorted to schoolyard threats. “You don’t understand, Mike,” Trump said. “You can do this. I don’t want to be your friend anymore if you don’t do this.” The following day, on the morning of January 6, he reportedly called Pence and taunted, “If you don’t do it, I picked the wrong man four years ago,” adding, “You’re going to wimp out.” It was apparently some time after that that Trump tried the “pussy” line on Pence, which obviously didn’t have the effect he’d hoped.

The Washington Post reports that Peril also contains the news that General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was legitimately terrified that the president was crazy enough to start a war with China just for shits.

In a pair of secret phone calls, Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, assured his Chinese counterpart, Gen. Li Zuocheng of the People’s Liberation Army, that the United States would not strike…The first call was prompted by Milley’s review of intelligence suggesting the Chinese believed the United States was preparing to attack. That belief, the authors write, was based on tensions over military exercises in the South China Sea, and deepened by Trump’s belligerent rhetoric toward China.

“General Li, I want to assure you that the American government is stable and everything is going to be okay,” Milley told him. “We are not going to attack or conduct any kinetic operations against you.” In the book’s account, Milley went so far as to pledge he would alert his counterpart in the event of a U.S. attack, stressing the rapport they’d established through a backchannel. “General Li, you and I have known each other for now five years. If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.”

In the second call, placed to address Chinese fears about the events of Jan. 6, Li wasn’t as easily assuaged, even after Milley promised him, “We are 100 percent steady. Everything’s fine. But democracy can be sloppy sometimes.” Li remained rattled, and Milley, who did not relay the conversation to Trump, according to the book, understood why. The chairman, 62 at the time and chosen by Trump in 2018, believed the president had suffered a mental decline after the election, the authors write, a view he communicated to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in a phone call on Jan. 8. He agreed with her evaluation that Trump was unstable, according to a call transcript obtained by the authors.

According to Woodward and Costa, in addition to the pair of phone calls, Milley gathered senior officers to go over the “procedures for launching nuclear weapons,” saying that while Trump alone could give the order, he had to be involved, and made the officers swear to him that they understood nothing should happen before confirming with him first.

His “immediate motivation” for doing so, according to the book, was apparently the call with Pelosi, in which the House Speaker demanded to know “What precautions are available to prevent an unstable president from initiating military hostilities or from accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike?” According to the transcript of the call, Pelosi, speaking for the majority of the country, reportedly told Milley, “He’s crazy. You know he’s crazy…He’s crazy and what he did yesterday is further evidence of his craziness.” Milley reportedly replied, “I agree with you on everything.”

READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611







"Look Me In The Eye" | Lucas Kunce for Missouri

  Help Lucas Kunce defeat Josh Hawley in November: https://LucasKunce.com/chip-in/ Josh Hawley has been a proud leader in the fight to ...