Search This Blog

Showing posts with label TRUMP TARIFFS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TRUMP TARIFFS. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 23, 2021

POLITICO NIGHTLY: 7 ways to name Biden’s agenda badly

 



 
POLITICO Nightly logo

BY ELANA SCHOR

With help from Myah Ward and Renuka Rayasam

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi talks to reporters during her weekly news conference in the U.S. Capitol Visitors Center.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi talks to reporters during her weekly news conference in the U.S. Capitol Visitors Center. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

WHAT’S IN A NAME? To crudely paraphrase Shakespeare, that which we call a bill can smell more or less sweet depending on its name.

President Joe Biden started his party’s journey to christening his 2021 legislative agenda in late March, when he outlined an infrastructure pitch that we initially pegged at more than $2 trillion. He followed that a month later with a social policy package originally estimated at $1.8 trillion . As those twin pillars went through the tortured fits and starts of what became a “two-track approach” (name one, for the process) to unite moderates and progressives behind both proposals, the infrastructure bill became known as “BIF,” an acronym for “Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework” (name two). That Beltway-centric acronym persisted among reporters, not to mention some lawmakers and aides, long after the F became a B (bill) and even an L (law), despite not exactly rolling off the tongue. The White House itself went with Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal.

The social policy portion of Biden’s huge swing has also acquired many names. Perhaps the least helpful to the party has been the “reconciliation” bill (name three), since it — like “two-track” — refers to the process Democrats are using to get the legislation passed rather than anything in the bill itself. The names “jobs” and “families” have also been used as shorthand for the infrastructure and social policy bills, respectively (names four and five), before the formal label of “Build Back Better Act” (name six) caught on enough to inspire a “Schoolhouse Rock”-style costumed bill who posed for pictures with House Democrats last week.

There’s also the formal name of the legislation that settled for “BIF” for too long! It’s called the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (name seven in total for the agenda).

If you’re exhausted by the terminology crush, your feelings are shared by quite a few folks who work full-time on tracking the bill. And the lack of a consistent, digestible shorthand to describe Biden’s ambitious set of domestic pillars really matters — especially when it comes to selling the legislation to voters, as Renuka Rayasm covered for Nightly last month.

More than simply marketing the two bills, at this point Democrats are selling themselves: The more down-to-earth they sound talking about their goals, the more likely their incumbents and candidates are to connect with the people who have to hire them every two or six years. And the awkward labels for the infrastructure and social policy bills only distance both the public and Congress from their core provisions, which tend to poll well. (Although a recent Morning Consult poll found a plurality of voters predicting the families/BBB/reconciliation bill will worsen inflation.)

When Shakespeare’s Juliet raised the question of what’s in a name, she was musing on the man-made power of an appellation to keep her from her true love in another family, at odds with hers. (“’Tis but thy name that is my enemy.”) Yet her creator also knew the power of a well-titled story to rivet centuries of readers. We’re not in the business of helping either party do their jobs, but just sayin’: “Roads-and-Rails” and “Health-and-Kids” are two names with exactly as many syllables as “Romeo” and “Juliet” that would have given Democrats a far catchier line.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. A programming note: We’ll be off for Thanksgiving this Thursday and Friday, but we’ll be back and better than ever on Monday, Nov. 29. Reach out with news, tips and Thanksgiving football predictions at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s author at eschor@politico.com, or on Twitter at @eschor.

 

BECOME A GLOBAL INSIDER: The world is more connected than ever. It has never been more essential to identify, unpack and analyze important news, trends and decisions shaping our future — and we’ve got you covered! Every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, Global Insider author Ryan Heath navigates the global news maze and connects you to power players and events changing our world. Don’t miss out on this influential global community. Subscribe now.

 
 
ON THE ECONOMY

Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell speaks as President Joe Biden listens during an announcement at the South Court Auditorium of Eisenhower Executive Office Building.

Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell speaks as President Joe Biden listens during an announcement at the South Court Auditorium of Eisenhower Executive Office Building. | Alex Wong/Getty Images

FED UP Biden said today he will reappoint Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, a move that keeps Powell in the government’s most powerful economic post as rising inflation spooks the country. Powell will likely face pressure from fellow Fed officials, some of whom believe the central bank should take aggressive action to stamp out rising prices, economics reporter Victoria Guida wrote today.

How should not just Powell and the Fed, but the whole of the federal government, respond to rising inflation? Nightly’s Myah Ward asked economists for their ideas. These responses have been edited.

“President Biden should continue his efforts to improve supply chains by, for example, increasing port capacity. He should take additional steps; the most important would be to reduce tariffs that are raising prices for Americans.

“But none of this will do that much — to really make a big difference the Federal Reserve will need to do more. The Fed is the primary agency responsible for controlling inflation, and it needs to shift its communications, be clearer about caring about both unemployment and inflation, taper asset purchases more quickly, and set a default path of three rate hikes for next year.” — Jason Furman, economic policy professor at Harvard and chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Barack Obama from 2013 to 2017

“Biden needs to look like he’s trying to combat surging prices. That’s politics. But if his economists are correct, inflation will simply fade away. Already the impact of $3 trillion in stimulus is starting to wane. And there are hints global bottlenecks are beginning to clear. The mismatch between supply and demand might slowly be returning to balance.

“But Biden shouldn’t assume all will be well in 2022. Rising inflation expectations suggest a non-zero risk that higher prices may prove sticky.

“So first, no more stimulus, no new deficit spending bills. And be careful with calls to investigate Corporate America for raising prices. Political uncertainty could chill business investment, which the economy needs to boost productive capacity. Higher productivity is anti-inflationary.

“Second, don’t let even a transitory crisis go to waste. Argue for anti-inflationary deregulation in pricey sectors such as housing, healthcare, and education. Examples: loosen restrictive zoning, let nurses do more, make colleges responsible when loan-burdened students don’t graduate.

“Third, if inflation persists, the Powell Fed (assuming the Senate approves a second term for the current chair) will need to act. Biden needs to give the central bank his full support, both privately and publicly.” — James Pethokoukis, economic policy analyst at the American Enterprise Institute and author of the Faster, Please! Substack newsletter

“We need federal policies that will help tackle the root causes of inflation: shortages that are the direct result of decades of disinvestment in our supply chains and the corporate extraction that has weakened our economy’s responsiveness to crises.

“Policymakers must take on the extractive corporate actors that are getting rich off of people’s pain. This means cracking down on pandemic profiteers and price gouging, and taxing corporations and the wealthy.

“The privatization of supply chains has resulted in a reliance on precarious labor that is a significant liability to supply chain resiliency. Shoring up the quality of jobs and addressing misclassification issues will not only help workers who move goods we all depend on, but also strengthen supply chains as a whole — creating a system that is able to withstand shocks.” — Rakeen Mabud, chief economist and managing director of policy and research, Groundwork Collaborative

“First, the Federal Reserve should increase the pace of its taper of asset purchases and end the ambiguity about how long it will let inflation run above target to make up for past shortfalls. This would likely require a clear timeline for rate liftoff beginning in 2022.

“Second, the federal government should address the stalled recovery in the labor force. This would include reintroducing work requirements into the expanded Child Tax Credit and other transfers, as was done in the 2017 expansion of the CTC. To incentivize continued labor force participation among older workers who left the workforce in 2020-21, the government could make the 2017 marginal personal income tax rate reductions permanent. I would avoid further large increases in fiscal transfers that merely fuel demand without raising supply.

“Finally, the government should make permanent the full expensing of new business investment in equipment, and rule out corporate income tax hikes. This would help close the $1.8 trillion shortfall in business investment since the pandemic began, which constitutes a 1 percent hit to potential output.

“Despite the focus on ports and supply chains, prudent monetary policy and fiscal policy that encourages labor force participation and business investment are ultimately much bigger issues.” — Tyler Goodspeed, Kleinheinz Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and acting chair and vice chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Donald Trump from 2020 to 2021

“The whipsaw of shutdowns and restarts across economic sectors precipitated by Covid-19 remains the main driver of inflation. The virus led spending to rush away from services towards goods, and the Delta variant gummed up supply chains around the world. Virus containment remains the most important economic priority.

“In the meantime, the Covid-19 inflation shock is being muffled, not amplified, by the labor market as average wage growth lags inflation. This has been tough on working families but means harsh medicine meant to stop wage-price spirals is not needed. The Federal Reserve’s decision to slowly reduce monthly asset purchases was prudent, providing a strong signal that inflation stability remains a crucial part of its mandate. But that’s enough for now.” — Josh Bivens, director of research at the Economic Policy Institute

“The blunt way we conduct monetary policy — near-zero interest rates and large-scale asset purchases — artificially drives up asset prices, including real estate. This has the dual effect of increasing rents and compounding pre-existing wealth gaps in our society. The Federal Reserve would do well to embrace the spirit of its targeted pandemic-era innovations such as the Municipal Liquidity Facility and the Main Street Lending Program. On the fiscal side, extending targeted policies such as the enhanced child tax credit and the expanded earned income tax credit — as called for in the Build Back Better Act — would help families weather the continuing economic fallout of the pandemic.” — Demond Drummer, managing director, equitable economy at PolicyLink

ASK THE AUDIENCE

Nightly asks you: Is there something you really want or need to buy, whether for the holiday season or just an everyday item, that you’ve noticed is far more expensive or seemingly impossible to get? Send us your responses using our form, and we’ll share some answers Wednesday.

WHAT'D I MISS?

— Jan. 6 committee subpoenas Roger Stone and Alex Jones: The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol is charging ahead with subpoenas on some longtime denizens of Trump World : InfoWars head Alex Jones, self-described dirty trickster Roger Stone, and rally promoters Dustin Stockton and Jennifer Lawrence. The committee is also subpoenaing former President Donald Trump’s current spokesperson, Taylor Budowich. Jones and Stone gave speeches to Trump supporters on Jan. 5, urging them to push back against the election results.

— Parnell suspends Pennsylvania Senate campaign: Sean Parnell, who was endorsed in the race by former President Donald Trump and has been the frontrunner in the Republican primary, lost a fight for custody of his children earlier today to his estranged wife, who had accused him of abuse in court testimony. Parnell called Trump to inform him of the decision to suspend his campaign.

Some pumpjacks operate while others stand idle in the Belridge oil field near McKittrick, Calif.

Some pumpjacks operate while others stand idle in the Belridge oil field near McKittrick, Calif. | Mario Tama/Getty Images

— Biden eyes SPR crude oil release: The Biden administration is expected to release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserves in coordination with other nations in the coming days in a bid to tamp down the recent increase in gasoline prices, people familiar with the effort said today. The U.S. release is expected to be between 30 million and 35 million barrels and would be carried out over time, one of the people said. The administration is currently trying to coordinate concurrent releases with foreign governments, including those in China and Japan, a process that has complicated the timing for an announcement, two of the people added.

— Hochul dominates gubernatorial field in early poll: Gov. Kathy Hochul is maintaining a healthy lead over her toughest challenger , state Attorney General Tish James, in her bid to win a term in her own right next year, according to a new Data for Progress poll shared with POLITICO. Hochul leads James 36-22 when the poll includes former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who resigned in August and has made no moves to reclaim his old seat. When he is omitted from the poll, the 15 percent support he received is fairly evenly divided among Hochul, James and others trailing the frontrunners.

— Rep. Peter Welch launches Senate bid for Leahy’s seat: Vermont Rep. Peter Welch announced today he will run for Senate next year to fill the seat held by retiring Sen. Patrick Leahy. It was widely anticipated that Welch would launch a bid for Leahy's seat. As the representative for Vermont’s at-large House district since 2007, Welch is the only other member of the state’s congressional delegation besides independent Sen. Bernie Sanders.

 

STEP INSIDE THE WEST WING: What's really happening in West Wing offices? Find out who's up, who's down, and who really has the president’s ear in our West Wing Playbook newsletter, the insider's guide to the Biden White House and Cabinet. For buzzy nuggets and details that you won't find anywhere else, subscribe today.

 
 
AROUND THE WORLD

‘VACCINATED, CURED OR DEAD’ — Germans will be “vaccinated, cured or dead” by the end of this winter, Health Minister Jens Spahn said today, as he rushed out extra doses of the coronavirus jab from BioNTech and Pfizer to inject into the arms of the one-third of people in the country who are still not vaccinated, Laurenz Gehrke writes.

Germany is experiencing record Covid-19 caseloads in the current fourth wave of the pandemic, putting hospital intensive care units under increasing strain — with unvaccinated patients far more likely to become critically ill.

“Probably by the end of this winter pretty much everyone in Germany — as has sometimes been cynically put — will be vaccinated, cured or dead," Spahn told a hastily arranged press conference, in his starkest warning to date of the risks of holding out against vaccination.

Spahn angered doctors last week by rationing scarce supplies of the vaccine devised by Mainz-based startup BioNTech, which is in favor thanks to its “Made in Germany” status, while saying no limits would apply to the distribution of doses from U.S. biotech company Moderna.

NIGHTLY NUMBER

95 percent

The proportion of the 3.5 million federal employees covered by Biden’s vaccine mandate for government workers who have complied with the requirement ahead of its deadline today, according to the White House.

PARTING WORDS

GAETZGATE FALLOUT — A Florida businessman pleaded guilty today to involvement in an effort to extort $25 million from the wealthy father of Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) as part of a bizarre scheme that involved a pledge to secure a presidential pardon for Gaetz in the high-profile federal sex trafficking investigation the lawmaker faces, Josh Gerstein writes.

Stephen Alford, 62, appeared in federal court in Pensacola to plead guilty to one count of wire fraud in connection with the convoluted shakedown, which also included securing the release of Robert Levinson, a former FBI agent who disappeared in Iran in 2007.

During the hearing, U.S. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Timothy recommended that Alford’s guilty plea be accepted. Alford, of Fort Walton Beach, faces a maximum of 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 at his sentencing, set for Feb. 16 before U.S. District Court Judge M. Casey Rodgers. Defendants typically get a sentence far below the maximum, but Alford could face a stiff prison term because he has prior federal convictions for fraud.

After being approached about the alleged pardon deal earlier this year, Matt Gaetz’s father Don went to the FBI. Agents helped the elder Gaetz, a wealthy former Florida state Senate leader, record meetings with Alford and others involved in the caper.


 

Follow us on Twitter

Chris Suellentrop @suellentrop

Tyler Weyant @tweyant

Renuka Rayasam @renurayasam

Myah Ward @myahward

 

FOLLOW US


 

POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA






Monday, November 1, 2021

Biden ends harmful Trump policy

 


House plans to pass infrastructure bill and Build Back Better on Tuesday

Today's Top Stories:

photo
Biden reaches deal to end Trump's steel tariffs

Republicans complain about inflation as Democrats undo the GOP actions that caused it.


In "chilling" decision, University of Florida professors have been barred from testifying against Florida
Legal scholars and free speech advocates are outraged by the state school's censorship, seemingly at the direction of Ron DeSantis.



photo
Adam Schiff on Trump finally testifying for Jan. 6 Committee

No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen: About time.


Biden among world leaders endorsing global corporate minimum tax at G-20
In America, Republicans are still trying to let their billionaire backers cheat the system, but Democrats and world leaders have other plans.



Trump's $300 million SPAC deal may have skirted securities laws
Why should securities laws be any different than all the others broken by the disgraced ex-president?


Passengers gasp as Southwest Airlines pilot insults President Biden on flight PA system
The right-wing's latest euphemism condemning the president rang unwanted in the passenger's ears as the pilot pushed his own political agenda.


Former Sheriff Joe Arpaio cost Arizona taxpayers $100 million
The cost of lawsuits and settlements from the Trump ally's brutality just surpassed nine digits.


photo
Steve Bannon defied subpoena and almost every Republican in Congress is defending him

United Rural Democrats: The House voted to hold the Trump crony in criminal contempt for DEFYING a subpoena for the deadly MAGA insurrection at the Capitol, and nearly every House Republican in the House is defending Bannon's lawlessness. Check out URD's ingenious plan to make sure they pay a price and how you can help before the critical deadline.


The conservative effort to take over school boards reaches fever pitch in one Colorado district
Republicans have turned their attention to lying to kids.


COP26: "Moment of truth" as world meets for climate summit
Literally everything depends on finally getting this right.


A post-Trump test for Democrats looms in Virginia election
Republicans in the purple state are threatening a new wave of voter suppression and Trumpian oppression as voters head to the polls Tuesday.



Trump wants call logs, aide’s notes hidden from January 6 panel
Maybe he's trying to cover up his innocence?


Seriously?

Yes. Seriously.

Hope...


Sunday Funnies

Sunday Funny
Sunday
Funny
Sunday Funny
Sunday Funny





Friday, October 29, 2021

POLITICO NIGHTLY: How Biden and Bernie switched roles on health care

 



 
POLITICO Nightly logo

BY JOANNE KENEN

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden smiles as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) (L) looks on during the Democratic presidential primary debate at the Charleston Gaillard Center in February 2020 in Charleston, S.C.

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden smiles as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) (L) looks on during the Democratic presidential primary debate at the Charleston Gaillard Center in February 2020 in Charleston, S.C. | Win McNamee/Getty Images

FACE/OFF — During the 2020 presidential campaign, Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders argued — and argued — over universal health care.

Sanders wanted Medicare for All, a government-financed plan that would cover everyone. Biden campaigned on making the Affordable Care Act passed by President Barack Obama more robust, with the goal of putting health care within everyone’s reach.

One surprising development in the seemingly endless negotiations over President Biden’s Build Back Better Act is that Biden and Sanders have sort of swapped goals, at least for this particular debate over health policy.

They are each still on the side of Medicare and Obamacare, respectively. But Biden now is trying harder to expand the number of people who get health care. And Sanders is trying harder to improve coverage for people who already have it.

A debate over what Congress can get done is more constrained than the idealistic rhetoric of a Democratic presidential primary. In 2021 — under the reality of a 50-50 Senate — single-payer or Medicare for All are not on the table. Nor is the Biden-favored public option.

The Democrats instead have been horse trading over whether dental, hearing and vision coverage should be added to Medicare; how long to extend expanded Obamacare subsidies; and how to close the Medicaid gap that leaves very poor people in a dozen anti-Obamacare states without any insurance coverage at all. In the framework Biden released this morning, ACA subsidies are in, there’s a Medicaid workaround, and Medicare would add benefits for hearing — but not for dental and vision.

Some of this is to be expected: After Biden won the 2020 primary, Democrats papered over their differences on health care and accepted that change would be incremental with the Affordable Care Act as the foundation, at least for now.

But as the endless dealmaking around the reconciliation bill shows, Democrats don’t agree on what “incremental” means, what’s the best next step toward universal coverage.

Is it shoring up the Affordable Care Act by expanding subsidies for millions and covering the poor whose states left them out of Medicaid, as Biden (and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi) seem to believe?

Or is it making Medicare — America’s socialized medicine for seniors — even stronger (and then, presumably, eventually expanding it to everyone)?

For Sanders, who can legitimately boast of pulling the Democrats to the left and expanding the realm of the possible, it’s still all about Medicare. If he can’t get Medicare for All, or even Medicare for More, he can at least get more Medicare for the people who already have it.

As Senate Budget chair, Sanders has a big voice in these negotiations, and today, after Biden released his framework for the Build Back Better Act, Sanders said he would keep pushing for dental and vision coverage.

Biden and Pelosi, without whom Barack Obama would never have been able to pull Obamacare over the finish line back in 2009-10, are more focused on the ACA. Back in March, Congress in the sweeping American Recovery Plan increased and restructured the ACA subsidies, giving middle-class people more affordable insurance, and increasing Obamacare enrollment. Biden’s framework would extend those changes through 2025.

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn has been the urgent voice for closing the Medicaid gap in the 12 states, largely in the South, that have rejected the Obamacare Medicaid expansion. It’s been harder to get Democratic consensus around that than one might expect, partly because it’s difficult to devise an approach that won’t end up rewarding the hold-outs or giving states that did expand a financial incentive to roll back. Today’s framework created another way to cover around 4 million low-income people who had been left out, using zero-premium plans in the Obamacare markets.

A commitment to attaining universal coverage — sooner or later, via one system or another — has become a core element of what it means to be a Democrat. To understand why Biden and Sanders, and their respective allies in Congress, ended up taking these very different approaches from their 2020 campaign proposals, Nightly called three people — two former Democratic HHS secretaries and the author of your host’s favorite book on health care and the presidency — this week to ask them to help us make sense of it.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Keep reading for the highlights of our conversations, which we had right before Biden unveiled his framework, with Kathleen Sebelius, Donna Shalala and David Blumenthal. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s author on Twitter at @JoanneKenen.

Former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius speaks about the Affordable Care Act during her visit to Community Health and Social Services Center in November 2013 in Detroit.

Former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius speaks about the Affordable Care Act during her visit to Community Health and Social Services Center in November 2013 in Detroit. | Joshua Lott/Getty Images

Kathleen Sebelius, who was Obama’s HHS secretary during the fight over the ACA, shifted the focus from squabbling Democrats to don’t-lift-a-finger Republicans. “Democrats are where they have been ever since the days of Franklin Roosevelt: Everyone deserves health care,” she said. “The Republicans — we leave them out of these discussions because they are clearly not interested in participating.” The GOP opposes pretty much everything on the Democratic health agenda.

She also shifted the focus beyond Biden and Sanders. There’s a “pent-up desire to put a lot of things in any health care bill,” Sebelius added. “There’s no question Democrats would like to do All of the Above. At the end of the day, how much of what stays in is not because of the battles among the people who are promoting the ideas but because of a couple of senators who have decided to trim the size of the bill and the topics. … It’s really, how much can you do to advance All of the Above in a reasonable way and get 50 votes.”

Speaking of those two unspoken senators (their names rhyme with Schmanchin and Minema), David Blumenthal, a former Obama-era health official, the president of the Commonwealth Fund and the co-author of “The Heart of the Power,” questioned whether the Democratic commitment to universal coverage really extends to every member of the party. Democrats, he said, are “always in favor of something more but never universally in favor of universal coverage.”

“It’s about money,” Blumenthal said. “Historically, Democrats have always divided on that question. … As you look back, when they’ve made major strides they’ve done it over the opposition of the economists in their administration and usually over groups of moderate Democrats. In that historic sense, there’s nothing different about this debate.”

But as a student of presidential struggles on health care, Blumenthal does think that history will look kindly on even a scaled back legislative package, particularly when paired with the infrastructure bill and the earlier American Recovery Plan legislation. But we’re not in “history” yet.

“I think it will historically be seen as a major set of accomplishments,” he said. “What the short-term spinning is, though, is to be determined.”

Donna Shalala, who lived through the collapse of Bill Clinton’s health reform as his HHS secretary, thinks her fellow Democrats have “more of a strategy than the disarray would suggest,” particularly with a 50-50 Senate and a tiny margin in the House.

Keeping the ACA enhanced subsidies is “absolutely critical,” she said, as is the “strategy to get the people left out (of Medicaid expansion) in places like Florida onto the ACA.” The package would do precisely that.

“I don’t see that as incremental,” she said. “It helps the working poor who are left out — people who are actually working. … Everybody who wants to get health care will get it.” Which is one way of describing universal coverage, even if it’s not free universal coverage, as some progressives want.

“No president and no Congress has ever taken a giant step in social policy with so few votes to spare,” Shalala said. “You’ve got to put it in historical contest.”

She also put the Biden agenda into its political context. Because many of the Build Back Better programs can go into effect quickly, she said, “It can be implemented by the midterms so people will feel the difference.”

Disclosure: Joanne Kenen is the Commonwealth Fund Journalist-in-Residence at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Blumenthal’s organization helps pay for that position.

 

JOIN TUESDAY FOR A TALK ON THE FUTURE OF SUSTAINABLE AIR TRAVEL: As delegates descend on Glasgow for the COP26 global climate summit, reducing carbon emissions in the aviation sector will play a critical role in the progress of fighting climate change. Join POLITICO for a deep-dive conversation that will explore the increased use of sustainable aviation fuel, better performance aircraft, and other breakthroughs in to cut greenhouse gas emissions and meet broader sustainability goals. REGISTER HERE.

 
 
WHAT'D I MISS?

Facebook debuts its new company brand, Meta, at their headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif.

Facebook debuts its new company brand, Meta, at their headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. | Kelly Sullivan/Getty Images for Facebook

— Facebook changes its name: Facebook announced today that it is changing its name to Meta , while unveiling a new logo resembling an infinity sign. Its flagship social media platform will still be called Facebook, however. And whatever its name, the world’s largest social media company faces growing trouble in Washington and other world capitals following the disclosure of a trove of internal documents by whistleblower Frances Haugen.

— Criminal complaint filed against Cuomo over forcible touching: Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo faces criminal charges in Albany County over accusations that he groped a staffer at the Executive Mansion last year. The complaint involves allegations made by former Cuomo staffer Brittany Commisso, who filed a complaint with the Albany County Sheriff’s office in August, shortly after state Attorney General Letitia James released a report verifying accounts from 11 women who described patterns of inappropriate behavior and sexual harassment from Cuomo.

— Justice Department announces tougher enforcement for white-collar crime: The Justice Department announced a series of policy changes today aimed at toughening the federal response to white-collar crime, particularly offenses involving corporate misconduct. Speaking to lawyers who often defend individuals and companies against such charges, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said the new approach would do more to deter crime in the nation's boardrooms and executive suites.

— U.S. jobless claims drop to pandemic low of 281,000: The number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits fell to a pandemic low last week as the job market continues to recover from last year’s coronavirus recession. Jobless claims dropped by 10,000 to 281,000, lowest since mid-March 2020, the Labor Department said today. Since topping 900,000 in early January, weekly applications have steadily dropped, moving ever closer to pre-pandemic levels just above 200,000.

— Cawthorne joins House Freedom Caucus: While it is less common to see the House Freedom Caucus add new members in the middle of a congressional term, members of the ultra-conservative group tell POLITICO that they decided to admit North Carolina Republican Rep. Madison Cawthorn after closely watching his voting record and evaluating how he leaned on certain “tough” votes.

 

BECOME A GLOBAL INSIDER: The world is more connected than ever. It has never been more essential to identify, unpack and analyze important news, trends and decisions shaping our future — and we’ve got you covered! Every Monday, Wednesday and Friday, Global Insider author Ryan Heath navigates the global news maze and connects you to power players and events changing our world. Don’t miss out on this influential global community. Subscribe now.

 
 
AROUND THE WORLD

EUROPE STEELS ITSELF — Europe is edging toward a deal in the coming days to end the transatlantic trade war , but that truce now looks likely to mean Brussels must accept quotas on how much steel can be shipped to the United States without paying higher level tariffs, Barbara Moens writes.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump triggered a trade war with Europe in 2018 by slapping tariffs on steel and aluminum imports that he classed as a threat to national security. European diplomats had originally hoped that Washington would remove these duties under Biden but he has been unwilling to do so without winning concessions for key steelmaking constituencies in America.

The contours of a deal now appear to be forming around Europe accepting tariff rate quotas. This would secure an immediate removal of the Trump-era tariffs but would mean that high duties on European metal would kick in again if EU exports surpassed a certain level. EU officials had regarded these kinds of measures as blackmail under Trump, but are now accepting there may be no other way out of the standoff.

NIGHTLY NUMBER

2 percent

The rate of growth of the U.S. economy in the July-September period, the weakest quarterly growth since the recovery from the pandemic recession began last year . Today’s report from the Commerce Department estimated that the nation’s gross domestic product — its total output of goods and services — declined sharply from the 6 percent-plus annual growth rates of each of the previous two quarters.

PARTING WORDS

Chief Judge Beryl Howell had harsh words for federal prosecutors cutting plea deals for light sentences with Jan. 6 insurrection defendants.

Chief Judge Beryl Howell had harsh words for federal prosecutors cutting plea deals for light sentences with Jan. 6 insurrection defendants. | Alex Wong/Getty Images | Alex Wong/Getty Images

JUDGE RIPS JAN. 6 PLEA DEALS A federal judge thrashed the Justice Department today for offering “petty offense” plea deals to Jan. 6 defendants who she said tarnished America’s reputation in the world and enabled violent rioters to threaten the peaceful transfer of power — even if they committed no violence themselves, Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein write.

Beryl Howell, the chief judge of the federal District Court in Washington, D.C., said prosecutors appeared “almost schizophrenic” in describing the insurrection in extreme terms but then settling for second-tier misdemeanor plea agreements with dozens of defendants. “This is a muddled approach by the government,” said Howell, an Obama appointee. “I’m trying to make sense of the government’s position here.”

Howell then made clear that she considered all participants in the Jan. 6 Capitol breach — which the Justice Department now estimates at 2,000 to 2,500 people — enablers of an assault against the republic.

“The damage to the reputation of our democracy, which is usually held up around the world … that reputation suffered because of Jan. 6,” Howell said, noting that the mob chased lawmakers and Vice President Mike Pence into hiding, and sent staffers ducking under their desks for cover.

“The rioters attacking the Capitol on Jan. 6 were not mere trespassers engaging in protected First Amendment conduct or protests,” Howell added. “They were not merely disorderly, as countless videos show the mob that attacked the Capitol was violent. Everyone participating in the mob contributed to that violence.”


 

Follow us on Twitter

Chris Suellentrop @suellentrop

Tyler Weyant @tweyant

Renuka Rayasam @renurayasam

Myah Ward @myahward

 

FOLLOW US


 POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA





"Look Me In The Eye" | Lucas Kunce for Missouri

  Help Lucas Kunce defeat Josh Hawley in November: https://LucasKunce.com/chip-in/ Josh Hawley has been a proud leader in the fight to ...