RSN: FOCUS: Why Delta and Omicron Could Be a 'Twin Epidemic'

 

 

06 December 21

Live on the homepage now!
Reader Supported News

OUR “FUNDRAISING GOAL” IS TO BE HERE — You are going to hear a lot about fundraising goals this month. A goal can be many things. Some of which may be tangible, others aspirational. We raise money to address costs. Those costs have remained essentially the same for years. What has changed is the difficulty we have in raising the same amount of money. December used to be a month for aspirations. It isn’t that anymore. Our goal for December is the survival of the organization. Be a part. It matters.
Marc Ash • Founder, Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

 

FOCUS: Why Delta and Omicron Could Be a 'Twin Epidemic'
James D. Walsh, New York Magazine
Walsh writes: "As Omicron numbers in South Africa soar and cases are identified around the globe, public-health officials are waiting for critical research on the new variant to assess just how much it has derailed the track to pre-pandemic normalcy."

As Omicron numbers in South Africa soar and cases are identified around the globe, public-health officials are waiting for critical research on the new variant to assess just how much it has derailed the track to pre-pandemic normalcy. So far, the research that’s available is concerning: Omicron appears to spread faster than Delta; prior infection may not provide sufficient protection; and it’s unclear how effective vaccines are against infection or how severely it sickens people. Intelligencer spoke with Baylor College of Medicine’s Dr. Peter Hotez, co-director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, about the public-health response to the new variant, holiday travel, and why an Omicron-specific booster would not be a slam dunk.

Where does your thinking stand on Omicron?

There’s a few ways to look at this variant. First of all, it looks as if there are a lot of similarities in terms of the spectrum of illness, so at this point, the two big questions are: Is it more transmissible than Delta, and what’s the story on immune escape? In terms of immune escape, we’ve seen all of these mutations in the receptor-binding domain in the spike protein, and that probably means Omicron will disproportionately affect people with partial immunity, either because they didn’t get vaccinated after infection and recovery or because they got their first two doses and never got their third. We have studies from the CDC that show people who were previously infected and recovered, but never got vaccinated, are twice as susceptible to Delta reinfection. That’s almost certainly going to be the case with Omicron reinfection. That’s what’s happening in South Africa, and it’s going to be a major issue if Omicron starts to gain ascendancy in the U.S. Now, there are studies from Michel Nussenzweig’s lab at Rockefeller University that show that people — not from Omicron, specifically — who are infected and recovered and then get vaccinated seem to have this phenomenon of epitope broadening and are more resilient to new variants.

Everybody is asking me, “Okay, I got three doses, and have that 30- to 40-fold rise in my virus-neutralizing antibody. Am I protected against Omicron?” The answer is, I think you probably are, but we don’t know. We’re doing experiments in our lab, because we have a COVID vaccine, and Moderna, Pfizer, and J…J, and AstraZeneca are almost certainly doing the same experiments.

As you said, the current vaccines, with boosters, offer a 30- to 40-fold increase in virus-neutralizing antibodies. At a public-health level, at what point should we be concerned about the efficacy overall of the vaccines?

We’ll have to see how much of a drop there is. We saw some drop in our virus-neutralizing antibodies against the Beta variant last year, and the Lambda. But it wasn’t enough to really concern us. The question is, will this drop even further and at what threshold will it really be a problem? And remember, this is all in vitro laboratory experiments. We still need to do the vaccine-effectiveness studies as well before we get a better picture.

The best-case scenario is that the antibodies in the three immunizations hold up. I’m pretty optimistic they’ll hold up at some level, at least to prevent hospitalizations, but I’m hoping for more than that. If it doesn’t, do you then try to develop an Omicron-specific booster? And is that feasible? People are just assuming that it is.

But vaccine makers have said they can tweak the existing formulas relatively easily, right?

The actual manipulations in the lab to make a booster are not complicated. But there is this phenomenon that’s sometimes called “original antigenic sin,” which means it’s not easy to shift over the immune response to something that’s similar but not quite the same. It’s not a slam dunk. You can’t just assume, “Yeah, no worries, we’ll just make an Omicron-specific booster.” It’s not hard to make, but we don’t know for certain that it’s going to work.

Should we develop an Omicron-specific vaccine; is it possible that the approach to vaccines becomes more prescriptive based on different personal characteristics and immunity?

That’ll depend on a lot of things. By the time that booster is ready and shown that it actually works, and goes through regulatory approval, there are potentially going to be a lot of people already infected with Omicron. Then you have to decide whether it’s worth it at that point. It probably is, but we need a lot more information. It’s going to be very complicated if we have to introduce Omicron-specific boosters. My strong hope is that we won’t have to go there, because it will get very messy very quickly.

What about it will be messy?

Actually demonstrating that it works, scaling up the distribution, the same vaccine-equity issues all over again, the public-health messaging, which has already been so complicated to begin with, and all of the anti-vaccine aggression. It’s doable, but if we have to go there, it’s going to be a slog at the scientific level, the public-health level, and policy level.

For the next few weeks we might see both variants in play, with Delta more likely to infect the unvaccinated and Omicron to infect those who are partially immune. For now, I think we should think about this as a twin epidemic of those two variants.

Should the worst-case scenario be true, that Omicron evades vaccines somewhat easily, what other public-health measures will be on the table?

Whether you’re worried about Delta or Omicron, as of today, the strategy is the same. If you’ve gotten two doses, get your third, if you’re eligible. If you are infected, recovered, and haven’t gotten vaccinated, get vaccinated. And vaccinate your kids. That’s going to be needed to combat the next Delta wave that’s coming and it’s going to be needed for Omicron as well.

If Omicron starts to accelerate to the point where it outcompetes Delta, like Delta outcompeted Alpha, then we’re going to start maximizing non-pharmaceutical interventions, which will include masking in public and minimizing large gatherings again.

Is that something we’ll understand before the holidays?

I think so. Roughly two weeks from now, we’ll know a lot more. A few days before the holidays, we’ll know whether Omicron is starting to really accelerate dramatically like it is in South Africa and we’ll know a lot more about the performance of the vaccines, both from the laboratory and in terms of people getting hospitalized and sick. In the meantime, my recommendation is to be conservative in terms of your activities, wearing masks when you go shopping and that sort of thing, and don’t be too ambitious about the types of holidays you’re planning. Try to keep the gatherings modest in size and with everybody vaccinated.

READ MORE

 

Contribute to RSN

Follow us on facebook and twitter!

Update My Monthly Donation

PO Box 2043 / Citrus Heights, CA 95611

POLITICO NIGHTLY: Don’t panic about Delta. But also, panic, a little.

 

BY JOANNE KENEN Presented by With help from Renuka Rayasam THE DELTA IS IN THE DETAILS — For public health officials and the Biden administration, the Delta variant is the biggest communication conundrum we’ve seen in a while. Don’t panic, they tell us in one breath. Well, maybe panic a bit, they tell us in the next, urging us to put our masks back on and think twice about how, when, where and with whom we gather indoors. Delta seldom makes vaccinated people seriously ill — but it can and does infect them, and then they in turn can infect others. Telling people to both vaccinate and mask is a little like telling them to carry an umbrella but if the rain gets really heavy, add a raincoat or boots, said Andy Slavitt, who did many pandemic briefings during his recent stint in the Biden White House. Getting across complex, changing information means communicating frequently and truthfully, he said. The “panic/don’t panic” conundrum breaks down into two parts. Don’t panic because the vaccines are pretty damn good, even for Delta. It’s rare for vaccinated people to get sick enough to go to the hospital and even better, it’s really rare for vaccinated people to die. This latest surge, as public health officials remind us, is largely an outbreak among the unvaccinated. The best way to protect ourselves and others, to contain the pandemic, is by getting vaccination rates way up. A sign reminds visitors to mask as people tour the Gateway Arch in downtown St. Louis. | Spencer Platt/Getty Images “With Delta, our vaccine coverage levels aren’t high enough to squash this virus,” said Julie Morita, who is now at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation but did her share of messaging when she was Chicago’s public health commissioner. “That applies both domestically and globally.” In other words, without enough vaccination, the cycle will keep repeating. Delta does cause breakthrough infections in vaccinated people — and infected people, even if they don’t have symptoms, can spread the virus. That’s where the renewed recommendations for masking and caution come in. But it’s still not clear whether Delta is making people sicker, or whether it just looks that way because it is making more people sick. There are a whole slew of unanswered questions about Delta. At a recent online seminar for clinicians held by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, a scientific organization that does lots of Covid outreach, 23 questions were asked. Almost every response included a “we don’t know” or a “that’s being studied.” How often do asymptomatic people spread the virus? Unknown. Are rapid antigen tests a better way to gauge infectiousness than PCR lab tests? “Unfortunately we do not yet have any data on this.” And — of particular concern to parents of school-age children not yet old enough for vaccination and/or going back to school in communities that don’t require masks — does Delta hit kids more severely than earlier variants did? “Multiple cohort studies are gathering these data and we hope to see them and share them soon.” You get the idea. Much of what we know about spread from vaccinated people comes from the outbreak in Provincetown, Mass., on Cape Cod, which was detected by public health officials who were, thankfully, paying attention. Whether there are similar outbreaks all over the country, with less surveillance and documentation, or whether the Cape Cod outbreak was a more singular superspreader kind of occurrence isn’t really clear. “Things are unpredictable — but it might be repeated,” Ezekiel Emanuel, a bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania who advised the Biden transition on Covid-19, emailed Nightly. “It is hard to know what precise factors contributed to that event or any superspreading event. But probably a combination — infectious agents, not everyone vaccinated, being close together over a long time at precisely the time someone was shedding a large amount of virus.” Even a year and a half into the pandemic, he said, much about the virus still “opaque” to doctors and scientists. But, as Emanuel pointed out — in fact he mentioned it several times during a separate Infectious Diseases Society media briefing this week — one reason we know so little about Delta is that we just aren’t testing very much. Tests aren’t as omnipresent and accessible as they were a few months ago. The lack of testing was the pandemic’s original sin . So many things that went wrong stemmed from the fact that, back in the early weeks and months of Covid, we didn’t have a good sense of where the virus was, where it was going, who it was hitting. Now, it seems it could be déjà -testing-vu all over again. But don’t panic. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas for us at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s author at jkenen@politico.com and on Twitter at @joannekenen.   A message from AT&T: Accessible, affordable broadband helps communities reach their American Dream. That’s why AT&T is making a $2 billion, 3-year commitment toward helping close the digital divide, so more low-income families have the ability to succeed. Find out how.   WHAT'D I MISS? — Cuomo faces multiple criminal investigations over sexual misconduct: Gov. Andrew Cuomo is facing four potential criminal investigations over findings that he sexually harassed and inappropriately touched multiple women . District attorneys in Manhattan, Nassau County, and Westchester County said today they are reviewing evidence in the case after the Albany County district attorney announced his own probe on Tuesday. — Top DOJ official drafted resignation email for Trump election pressure: In early January 2021, one top Justice Department official was so concerned that then-President Donald Trump might fire his acting attorney general that he drafted an email announcing he and a second top official would resign in response. The official, Patrick Hovakimian, prepared the email announcing his resignation and that of the department’s second-in-command, Richard Donoghue, as Trump considered axing acting attorney general Jeff Rosen. At the time, Hovakimian was an associate deputy attorney general and a senior adviser to Rosen. — Psaki blames Republicans for holding up ATF nominee: White House press secretary Jen Psaki today accused Senate Republicans of “moving in lockstep” to block the Biden administration’s pick to lead the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms. But that nominee, David Chipman, has yet to secure the support of all 50 members of the Senate Democratic caucus, which would allow him to be confirmed without any Republican support. — Newsom can reference Trump in argument against recall, judge says: Gov. Gavin Newsom can keep references to Republicans and Trump in his official argument against the recall , a judge tentatively ruled today. Recall proponents argued that Newsom’s allusions were misleading and asked a court to strike them from the state’s official voter information guide. But Sacramento Superior Court Judge Laurie M. Earl sided with Newsom in a tentative ruling, finding that the “recall effort was clearly spearheaded by Republicans.” — Senators propose narrowing cryptocurrency tax language in infrastructure bill: A bipartisan group of lawmakers today moved to narrow a cryptocurrency tax provision in the Senate’s infrastructure bill after industry complaints that it was too broad. The amendment, led by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), would narrow the definition of what counts as a broker in the provision to exclude certain crypto groups, including miners, software developers and transaction validators.   STEP INSIDE THE WEST WING: What's really happening in West Wing offices? Find out who's up, who's down, and who really has the president’s ear in our West Wing Playbook newsletter, the insider's guide to the Biden White House and Cabinet. For buzzy nuggets and details that you won't find anywhere else, subscribe today.     ASK THE AUDIENCE COVID COURT IS BACK IN SESSION — With the Delta variant on the loose, Covid cases on the rise, more reports of breakthrough infections and vaccinations stalling, things are as confusing as ever. So Judge Renu is back in session to help answer your questions about navigating this stage of the pandemic. Do you have an unresolved disagreement over Covid risk management with a relative or colleague? Or do you have questions about the virus or vaccine that haven’t been answered? Ask Renu to issue a ruling! Email your pandemic disputes to nightly@politico.com. FROM THE DEFENSE DESK THE TALIBAN OFFENSIVE — The U.S. is just weeks away from completing its Aug. 31 withdrawal from Afghanistan, and already the Taliban has made major gains into the country’s major cities. Local officials confirmed Tuesday that the militant group has already captured much of the Helmand province and its capital Lashkar Gar. Alexander Ward, who writes POLITICO’s new National Security Daily newsletter, talked with Nightly’s Renuka Rayasam over Slack today about whether the Taliban offensive will affect U.S. strategy. This conversation has been edited. This is a big deal, right? Oh yeah. Everyone, including Biden administration officials, expected the Taliban would make some advancements once U.S. and allied troops withdrew from Afghanistan. The speed and swiftness of the takeover is what really surprised Biden’s team. The question now is how far does the Taliban go? The Afghan government says they’re fighting back and there’ll be a military stalemate in about six months. Whether or not that assessment is accurate or too rosy is the big question. Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Mark Milley and Biden said a Taliban takeover isn’t a foregone conclusion. Are they changing their minds? No, and in a sense they’re completely right to believe that. The momentum is clearly on the Taliban’s side, but they have struggled to conquer larger urban areas, including Kabul. It’s possible that the Afghan government is right and that a stalemate is coming. But no one can deny the current picture is grim. The general consensus is the Taliban runs mainly rural areas and the government keeps control of mostly urban areas. That’s untenable, of course, and a recipe for a prolonged civil war. I have read that the Taliban is being more diplomatically savvy now compared with the last time they held power two decades ago. Is this true? For sure. They’re giving tons of lip service to engaging diplomatically, providing themselves some political cover as militants sweep across the country. The Biden administration says it’s worth testing the Taliban’s sincerity in reaching a pact, but few outside Biden’s orbit believe the group actually wants a deal. In fact, the U.S. special envoy for Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, recently said that the Taliban now thinks it has the upper hand in talks because of its military gains. Another aspect is the Taliban has on rare occasions tempered its brutality. To be clear, it’s still a terrible, horrible group that abuses the human rights of everyone. But it realized it can’t go over the top all the time, or it risks becoming an even greater pariah on the world stage. Of course, old habits die hard. Is there a direct security threat to the U.S. from the Taliban gains? The Taliban swears it learned its lesson and won’t allow terrorist groups to thrive in Afghanistan again, but it’s of course possible the group is lying or some terrorists move in and stay anyway, even if the Taliban wants them out. The U.S. will continue its counterterrorism mission in Afghanistan. That means the U.S. will still bomb terrorist positions that could pose a threat to America. Is there a trigger that would cause the U.S. to go back? There are reports indicating the U.S. military would seek authorization from Biden to launch airstrikes against the Taliban if it’s on the verge of taking over a major city like Kabul. But it’s unclear if Biden would approve such requests or if they would even be necessary. Maybe the U.S. goes in again, but I highly doubt it. The politics are against any president re-sending U.S. troops back into that country’s war, and Biden has made pretty clear that once we’re out, we’re out. Whether he keeps that promise is something to watch closely throughout his entire presidency.   A message from AT&T:     FIRST IN NIGHTLY “While most of the ink spilled on the divides within the contemporary Republican Party focuses on its pro-Trump and anti-Trump wings, a stark ideological divide on economic issues is also emerging over how to chart a post-Trump future for the GOP. “The debate centers on what lessons to draw from Trump, who talked like a populist but governed — with the exception of trade policy — more like a Reaganite. The divide doesn’t quite fall along pro- and anti-Trump lines. The pro-Trump former United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley, for example, has emerged as a leading champion of traditional free-market policies in opposition to other pro-Trumpers like J.D. Vance and Josh Hawley. The battle is likely to play out in the 2024 presidential primary, and shape the future of Republican politics long after Trump exits stage left.” — From Eliana Johnson’s report on the rise of ‘common-good capitalists’ — and their role in the next big policy fight inside the GOP. Coming Thursday in POLITICO Magazine.   SUBSCRIBE TO "THE RECAST" TODAY: Power is shifting in Washington and in communities across the country. More people are demanding a seat at the table, insisting that politics is personal and not all policy is equitable. The Recast is a twice-weekly newsletter that explores the changing power dynamics in Washington and breaks down how race and identity are recasting politics and policy in America. Get fresh insights, scoops and dispatches on this crucial intersection from across the country and hear critical new voices that challenge business as usual. Don't miss out, SUBSCRIBE . Thank you to our sponsor, Intel.     AROUND THE WORLD HOLD OFF ON BOOSTERS, SAYS WHO — The World Health Organization called today for a moratorium on coronavirus vaccine booster vaccines until at least the end of September , as wealthy nations gear up to start administering third doses. The call from WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus would mean countries hold off giving third jabs to allow for at least 10 percent of every country’s population to be vaccinated. Israel and Hungary began to offer booster vaccines to at-risk groups in their countries at the start of August. Several other nations have also set out plans for third doses, including the U.K. and Germany, both of which are planning to begin doling out third jabs in September. In May, the WHO called for every country to have vaccinated at least 10 percent of its population by the end of September. The world is not on track to meet that target. “High-income countries have now administered almost 100 doses for every 100 people,” Tedros said. “Meanwhile, low-income countries have only been able to administer 1.5 doses for every 100 people, due to lack of supply.” NIGHTLY NUMBER 53 percent The percentage of Americans who approve of Biden’s handling of the pandemic, according to a Quinnipiac poll released today. Biden’s job approval rating fell more slightly. PARTING WORDS OPINION: WHY TRUMP IS BOOING TEAM USA — When did Americans start booing Americans, senior media writer Jack Shafer asks? Sure, boo-birds are a feature of sports fandom. They can be found in every stadium, at every sports bar, in front of every television. But the open jeering of 2021 U.S. Olympic athletes appears to be unprecedented. Last week, Trump actually celebrated the defeat of the American women’s soccer team and urged his followers to do the same. Newsmax host Grant Stinchfield cooed his “pleasure” over the defeat of the American men’s basketball team by France. And revanchist elements of the hard-right commentariat rose to savage gymnast Simone Biles as a “quitter” and “selfish sociopath” after she withdrew from some events. Trash-talking of American Olympians by Americans cuts hard against the grain. For politicians and pundits, extravagant praise of Olympians has always been an easy default move. Thank you for representing your country in the, uh, canoe slalom! You brought us all together with your courage and performance! But to come out actively against them? It might seem a little strange or unpatriotic to tee off on the athletes representing your country (not to mention racist, in the case of the slaps at Biles and the “woke” NBA players), but it’s not even close to being against the “spirit of the Olympics.” In fact, it’s consistent with the politicization of the modern games, which goes back to their beginnings. If you start to think of the Olympics as less of an athletic competition and more of a quadrennial international political convention, the cheap shots and settling of partisan points are only the latest domestic twist in the Games’ long history as a political arena — charged by our newly acidic politics and amplified a thousandfold by social media and sensation-seeking cable news shows.   A message from AT&T: Susana Chávez became valedictorian of International High School at Langley Park while juggling numerous jobs throughout school. But what kept her powering through it all was her American Dream. With the help of accessible and affordable broadband, she was able to focus on her studies, get assistance from teachers and stay in touch with her mother back home. And thanks to Access from AT&T, we can connect low-income households like Susana’s, and more communities in areas we serve with their American Dream. Find out how.   Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.   Follow us on Twitter Renuka Rayasam @renurayasam Chris Suellentrop @suellentrop Tyler Weyant @tweyant Myah Ward @myahward   FOLLOW US

POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA

POLITICO NIGHTLY: When you’ll need your third Covid shot

 

BY MYAH WARD Presented by With help from Renuka Rayasam BOOSTER CLUB — Will I need a booster shot? When? Covid cases are rising in almost every state as the Delta variant attacks unvaccinated populations across the U.S. This discouraging trend, combined with Pfizer’s announcement last week that the company planned to seek approval for a Covid booster shot, has unleashed third-dose panic among the vaccinated. The unsatisfying answer to both questions is that scientists don’t know. But the bottom line: You don’t need a booster shot right now, and you probably won’t anytime soon. “There’s no evidence right now that the general population needs a booster dose because we’re not seeing evidence of waning immunity or substantially reduced effectiveness against the Delta variant,” William Moss, executive director of the International Vaccine Access Center at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said in an interview with Nightly. Tons of scientists are keeping an eye on this. Studies are being conducted by academic institutions and the CDC. Pharmaceutical companies, like Pfizer and Moderna, are observing their earliest vaccine recipients. A patient is given his Pfizer BioNTech Covid-19 vaccination by a doctor at Haxby and Wigginton Surgery in York, England. | Ian Forsyth/Getty Images There’s not just one metric that will determine when it’s time to roll out the boosters, Moss said. Researchers are looking at symptomatic breakthrough infections, hospitalizations and deaths in immunized people. The second tier of evidence, Moss said, is antibody levels. Antibody levels are a less important data point because it’s normal for these levels to decrease over time, Moss said. It’s how the immune system works. Lower antibodies don’t necessarily mean a person is more susceptible to the coronavirus or will have severe disease. Nor is there a specific number or benchmark that scientists are waiting for to say it’s go-time, Moss said. It will be a judgment call, one made by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The group is scheduled to meet next week to discuss boosters for the immunocompromised. Variants like Delta do complicate immunity, and it’s possible we’ll need a booster if we see a variant that can evade the vaccine’s protection. But with what experts know about immune systems and other vaccines, Moss said he doesn’t expect vaccinated people to need another shot in 2021 or even 2022. “I think for most people, outside those special populations, the immunocompromised and maybe the elderly — I think most people’s immunity is going to last years, to be honest,” Moss said. Moss said “years” is difficult to define, but if he had to guess, he would say three to four years, and maybe longer, before we need a booster. When it is time to roll out a new round of doses, Moss said he envisions it like the U.S.’s initial vaccine distribution — targeting the most vulnerable groups first like immunocompromised, elderly populations and health care workers. Then we may see a recommendation for the general public. By that time, Moss added, we’ll see more vaccine mix-and-matching, if the evidence supports it. Maybe you got Johnson & Johnson for your first dose but could get the Pfizer booster. Other vaccine options are also expected to be available by then, like Novavax, which plans to file for emergency use authorization by the end of September. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas for us at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s author directly at mward@politico.com or @MyahWard. A message from AstraZeneca: Through COVAX, we are working with partners GAVI (the Vaccine Alliance), WHO (World Health Organization), CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations) and SII (Serum Institute of India) to ensure people around the world have access to safe, effective COVID-19 vaccines, wherever they live and regardless of income level. Learn more here.   WHAT'D I MISS? — Biden: Child tax credits will be among administration’s top achievements: Biden said today that the monthly child tax credits that Americans began receiving this week will be among his administration’s proudest accomplishments . “It’s historic and it’s our effort to make another giant step towards ending child poverty in America,” Biden said today. “I think this will be one of the things the vice president and I will be most proud of when our terms are up.” — Facebook blocks highly targeted Iran-linked hacking campaign: Facebook has interrupted a sophisticated and highly targeted hacking campaign by a group that some experts have linked to the Iranian government , the company said today. The hacker group known as “Tortoiseshell” used Facebook and other social networks to trick military personnel and defense and aerospace industry employees into downloading custom malware that spied on victims and stole their data, the company said in a blog post. — Trump denies coup attempt in latest attack on Milley: Former President Donald Trump attacked Gen. Mark Milley again today, this time over new reports that the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff sought to prevent Trump from perpetrating a government takeover reminiscent of Nazi Germany in the aftermath of the 2020 election. In a more than 400-word statement issued from his post-presidential office, Trump denied that he had ever “threatened, or spoke about, to anyone, a coup of our Government,” calling the notion “So ridiculous!” — Black Caucus Chair arrested during protest in Capitol complex: Congressional Black Caucus Chair Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio) was among nine protesters arrested this afternoon who were calling on the Senate to pass voting rights legislation. Chanting “end the filibuster” and “let the people vote” the group marched into Hart Senate Office Building in what Beatty said was an effort to “send (senators) a message.” — Democrats launch immigration reform Hail Mary: Top Democrats, with the support of the White House, are planning to tuck a handful of immigration measures into their forthcoming $3.5 trillion spending bill. The tactic — which just months ago seemed like a long shot even to liberals — is now widely seen as Biden’s best shot at delivering on a decades-long party promise.   SUBSCRIBE TO "THE RECAST" TODAY: Power is shifting in Washington and in communities across the country. More people are demanding a seat at the table, insisting that politics is personal and not all policy is equitable. The Recast is a twice-weekly newsletter that explores the changing power dynamics in Washington and breaks down how race and identity are recasting politics and policy in America. Get fresh insights, scoops and dispatches on this crucial intersection from across the country and hear critical new voices that challenge business as usual. Don't miss out, SUBSCRIBE . Thank you to our sponsor, Intel.     AROUND THE WORLD BOOING BOOSTERS — The talk of Covid boosters in the U.S. has infuriated global health leaders, complicating the ethics surrounding a third dose. This week, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus blasted the idea of a third shot when health care workers around the world have yet to receive their first dose. During Nighty’s phone call with JHU’s William Moss to discuss boosters, Myah asked Moss to weigh in on the debate. The U.S. needs to do more to address global vaccine inequities, Moss said. And the fact that a large proportion of Americans have a free vaccine at their fingertips but remain against it only makes this more problematic, he added. “I’m glad he said that,” Moss said. “It makes me think, OK, if people in the United States don’t want the vaccines, we should give the vaccines to those who really want them.”       WILD, WILD WESTERN HEMISPHERE — The Pentagon has made clear it has no appetite for a new military entanglement in Latin America, following dual crises in Haiti and Cuba this week. Yet lawmakers, former officials and experts are calling on Biden to devote more resources to a region they say has been long neglected by the United States. Top military officials at U.S. Southern Command have warned for years that Russia, China and other bad actors are rushing to fill the power vacuum left by Washington’s deprioritization of Central and South America in favor of faraway places such as the Middle East, Lara Seligman writes. Now, the shocking assassination of the Haitian president and historic unrest in Cuba are a stark reminder of how quickly tumult can erupt in America’s own backyard — and the potential security ramifications for the entire region. U.S. officials have thus far declined to fulfill Haitian officials’ requests to send American troops to help calm the situation, although they sent a small number of personnel to shore up the U.S. Embassy there immediately after President Jovenel Moïse’s assassination. And though Biden has voiced support for the protesters in Cuba, most of his administration’s policy toward the country, including potentially lifting Trump-era sanctions, remains a mystery. NIGHTLY NUMBER 82 The age of Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer. Breyer has not decided when he will retire from the Supreme Court, he told CNN in an interview published today . The two factors that would impact his retirement plans, Breyer said, are “primarily, of course, health,” and “second, the court.”   SUBSCRIBE TO "THE RECAST" TODAY: Power is shifting in Washington and in communities across the country. More people are demanding a seat at the table, insisting that politics is personal and not all policy is equitable. The Recast is a twice-weekly newsletter that explores the changing power dynamics in Washington and breaks down how race and identity are recasting politics and policy in America. Get fresh insights, scoops and dispatches on this crucial intersection from across the country and hear critical new voices that challenge business as usual. Don't miss out, SUBSCRIBE . Thank you to our sponsor, Intel.     PARTING WORDS DON’T YOU (FORGET ABOUT ME) — Renuka Rayasam emails from Texas: When the pandemic first hit last March and all of my colleagues scrambled to figure out how to work from home, I confess I experienced a moment of schadenfreude. I have worked remotely for years and already knew all the indignities and frustrations that came with being disconnected from a physical office. Now, as my coworkers prepare to head back to the newsroom this fall for their in-person meetings, stocked supply room and shiny white desks adorned with second monitors, I worry about the rest of us, who were always remote, being left behind. Many employers are pushing for a return to the office because they say it will foster connection and culture. And in many ways it does. But during the past year, with everyone remote, my employer figured out how to accommodate the needs of workers scattered across the country. I could vent or gossip with colleagues over Slack, team meetings were moved to Zoom and coworkers picked up their phones and called me directly to chat. The pandemic made parts of my work life awful in other ways — I was forced to abandon a coworking space I got shortly after the end of my second maternity leave and move to a desk in the corner of our bedroom. But at least, for the first time, I felt actually connected to a lot of people toiling away in HQ whom, before the pandemic, I had never met and who probably had never thought about me. I had officemates. But will I still have them next year? I’m just going to say it bluntly: Before the pandemic, when our colleagues were distracted by snacks and after-work drinks and hallway chatter, those of us far afield were an afterthought to most office workers. One time, during a meeting long before the pandemic, no one in POLITICO’s Rosslyn office could get the conferencing technology to work. So someone in the room called me directly on their cell phone and put me on speakerphone. From my home in Texas I could hear garbled voices and the occasional laugh, and not much else. Now that Zoom is a firmly entrenched part of our meeting culture, I doubt I will have to sit through a meeting I can’t understand anytime soon. But I worry that the people sitting together in conference rooms will slowly forget about us. They’ll chatter away with their neighbors while those of us at home will wish our computer monitors had peripheral vision to see what was happening off camera. Will anyone in my “fun” Slack channels bother to respond when I drop random tidbits, like the time I just needed to tell a private channel how much I was loving the book Pachinko and got tons of other great book recommendations in response? This is not a plea to delay an in-person return to the office or school. And I’m grateful for the benefits of remote work, like not having to commute. But the pandemic leveled the playing field of coworker interactions. I’m worried that my colleagues will gravitate back to their in-person officemates, losing interest in their virtual peers. Now that I know what I am missing, it’s hard to imagine going back to the time before the pandemic, when so often I was left out but didn’t realize it. I already missed the first in-person office party , though I did order Thai food with the UberEats gift card that we still-remote workers got as solace. And before everyone went off to sip drinks on an Adams Morgan rooftop, I lurked in a Slack channel where people discussed what they should wear to the party. For the record, I would have put on a black jumpsuit. A message from AstraZeneca: The COVAX initiative is an unprecedented effort to ensure fair and equitable global COVID-19 vaccine distribution. Through COVAX, many more shipments of the COVID-19 vaccine, including our own product, are planned over the coming weeks and months to low- and middle-income countries as the fight against the virus continues. We have always understood vaccination as a global, no-profit, equity-focused undertaking and were the first pharmaceutical company to join COVAX in June 2020. Through COVAX and other global initiatives, we have supplied more than half a billion COVID-19 vaccine doses to 170 countries; 300 million of which have gone to low-income regions. Learn more here.   Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.   Follow us on Twitter Renuka Rayasam @renurayasam Chris Suellentrop @suellentrop Tyler Weyant @tweyant Myah Ward @myahward   FOLLOW US

POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA, 22209, USA